Habilidades gpt-series-reasoning-style

📦

gpt-series-reasoning-style

Name: gpt-series-reasoning-style
Author: jadeyingwah

v1.2.0 Revisión del contenido r2 Seguro 🌐 Acceso a red⚙️ Comandos externos📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos

Coordinate Evidence-Driven Agent Workflows

Complex agent tasks often begin before scope, risk, and evidence requirements are clear. This skill adds gates, role discipline, verification, and explicit acceptance.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 76 Adecuado

Detente y solicita confirmación antes de instalar.

Revisa el plan y obtén el consentimiento explícito del usuario antes de modificar archivos.

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente

Review the Skillstore skill "gpt-series-reasoning-style" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Add account export to an existing web application.

Resultado esperado:

Risk tier: medium because the change handles personal data and affects multiple layers.
Resources: existing export services, privacy rules, test fixtures, and browser tooling.
Acceptance: permission checks, complete exports, cancellation handling, and verified download behavior.

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Review whether a reported migration is complete.

Resultado esperado:

The migration claim remains UNVERIFIED until fresh tests and database checks are attached.
The evidence plan covers rollback, record counts, constraints, and representative edge cases.

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Coordinate separate implementation and review agents.

Resultado esperado:

One DRI owns closure, while implementation and review roles receive separate task packages.
Each handoff includes scope, prohibited changes, evidence locations, and unresolved risks.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro

v2 • 12/9/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

Most static alerts are false positives caused by defensive examples, readable Chinese prose, Markdown syntax, SVG paths, and documented installation locations. One high-risk behavior is confirmed: claim-check executes claims-file commands through shell=True, so hostile or insufficiently reviewed input can run arbitrary code. Static review was capped at 400/554 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.

Archivos escaneados

13,494

Líneas analizadas

Elementos de revisión

Falsos positivos ignorados

Elementos de revisión de capacidades (1)

Estas son capacidades locales reales que pueden esperarse para esta habilidad, por lo que requieren revisión, pero no se cuentan como comportamiento malicioso confirmado.

Alto

scripts/claim-check.py:372

Python subprocess.run

proc = subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, cwd=str(root),

This call passes commands parsed from a claims file to subprocess.run with shell=True. The file and SECURITY.md explicitly acknowledge that hostile input can execute arbitrary code.

Factores de riesgo

🌐 Acceso a red (13)

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json:18 .claude-plugin/marketplace.json:19 .claude-plugin/plugin.json:8 .claude-plugin/plugin.json:9 README.md:35 site/index.html:104 site/index.html:109 site/index.html:110 site/index.html:111 site/index.html:112 site/index.html:113 site/index.html:114 site/index.html:118

⚙️ Comandos externos (50)

📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (50)

Auditado por: codex Ver historial de auditorías →

Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

jadeyingwah. (2026). gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.2.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/2

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{jadeyingwah-jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style-2026,
  author = {jadeyingwah},
  title = {gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 2)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {2},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/2},
  note = {Author version 1.2.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "1.2.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jadeyingwah"
date-released: "2026-09-12"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/2"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style:audit:2"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio

Arquitectura

100

Mantenibilidad

Contenido

Comunidad

Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Structure a complex implementation

Define scope, risks, resources, verification, and acceptance before changing a codebase.

Coordinate independent agents

Assign roles, package tasks, track evidence, and keep one accountable owner.

Audit completion claims

Compare stated results with fresh tests, files, screenshots, and explicit coverage.

Prueba estos prompts

Plan a focused task

Use this skill to assess my task. State the risk tier, needed resources, plan, and verification before implementation.

Prepare an evidence plan

Define acceptance criteria for this deliverable. List fresh evidence, tested input ranges, and anything that must remain UNVERIFIED.

Run a rigorous implementation

Apply the full workflow to this high-impact change. Track scope, risks, decisions, review findings, tests, and final acceptance evidence.

Coordinate multiple agents

Design a commander workflow for this task. Define roles, task packages, trust tiers, handoffs, evidence requirements, and final DRI closure.

Mejores prácticas

Use the light workflow only for specific, reversible, low-impact tasks.
Attach fresh evidence to every completion claim and label untested areas UNVERIFIED.
Keep one DRI accountable even when several agents contribute.

Evitar

Do not treat a declared plan as permission to implement.
Do not report test counts without naming the covered and uncovered input ranges.
Do not accept another agent's completion statement without checking its evidence.