Review Agent-Flow Diffs Against Repository Rules
Code changes can miss acceptance criteria, repository rules, or security boundaries. This skill performs a read-only review and returns structured, line-anchored findings.
Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/drix10-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.
Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.
Usando "reviewer". Review a change that implements the feature but adds no test for one acceptance criterion.
Resultado esperado:
Requests changes and identifies the unproven criterion as a blocking implementation error with file evidence and a test suggestion.
Usando "reviewer". Review a correct diff that updates a protected path.
Resultado esperado:
Requests changes because the protected-path violation is always blocking, even when the implementation appears correct.
Usando "reviewer". Reconsider a prior warning after the implementer provides decisive repository evidence.
Resultado esperado:
Withdraws the warning, records why the evidence resolves it, and approves only when every criterion remains satisfied.
All 21 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline-code delimiters and a fenced JSON example. The skill contains no executable commands or command-substitution syntax, and no semantic security issue was found.
Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.
https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/drix10-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/drix10-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>drix10. (2026). reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer/audits/1@techreport{drix10-drix10-reviewer-2026,
author = {drix10},
title = {reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "drix10"
date-released: "2026-09-27"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:drix10-reviewer:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare a submitted diff with issue criteria before another agent continues.
Inspect authentication, payment, contract, or personal-data changes for missing safeguards.
Find protected-path edits, dependency risks, unrelated changes, and conflicts with repository guidance.
Review the supplied agent-flow diff against its acceptance criteria. Return the required structured verdict with evidence for every finding.
Review each acceptance criterion. Identify its implementation and test evidence, then flag every unsupported criterion as an implementation error.
Review this diff for protected paths, dependencies, outbound calls, injection risks, secret exposure, authorization gaps, and partial-write failures.
Review the latest diff, prior findings, and implementer evidence. Withdraw unsupported findings and explain what evidence is still missing for retained findings.
Autor
drix10Licencia
MIT
Revisión de Skillstore
r1
Aviso de versión
El autor no declaró una versión.
Repositorio
https://github.com/drix10/agent-flow/tree/aac4c5c023b25d073997626804c355ed11348feb/skills/reviewerRef.
8b5ad1599e7c55e9b6c627bca3f556f6e9061cb1
Actualidad del mantenimiento
30/9/2026
Uso
0 descargas · 0 vistas
Estructura de archivos
📄 SKILL.md
Implement Git Issues in Isolated Worktrees
Issue implementation can drift beyond scope or produce incomplete handoffs. This skill applies focused changes, runs project checks, commits once, and reports structured evidence.
Maintain Accurate Agent Context
Stale context files mislead agents and increase maintenance risk. Gardener verifies documentation against code, repairs references, and keeps risk baselines controlled.
Run Reliable Repository Quality Gates
Test failures, type errors, and lint issues can be difficult to classify consistently. This skill runs approved checks, retries failures once, and returns structured evidence.
Orchestrate Issues Through Review and QA
Multi-agent issue delivery can lose state, mix roles, and skip safeguards. This skill coordinates implementation, review, QA, escalation, and pull request creation through agent-flow.
Bootstrap Repository Context for Coding Agents
Coding agents lose accuracy when repository guidance is missing or outdated. This skill creates reviewed context files, confidence labels, and risk boundaries with human approval.
Review Defects and Verify Root-Cause Repairs
por aakashh242
Reviews can miss failure conditions or accept fixes without reliable evidence. Gauntlet guides scoped adversarial reviews, authorized repairs, and revision-bound verification within a finite budget.
Audit NestJS Code with Evidence-Backed Findings
por amirtaherkhani
NestJS repositories can hide boundary flaws and runtime risks that lint results alone cannot reveal. This skill combines local evidence collection and semantic review into one prioritized report.
Revisar código con controles de calidad estructurados
por alirezarezvani
Las revisiones de código pueden pasar por alto problemas de calidad, seguridad y mantenibilidad. Esta skill guía revisiones estructuradas con scripts, listas de comprobación y generación de informes.
Revisar Código para Detectar Errores y Problemas de Seguridad
por 21pounder
Las revisiones de código pueden pasar por alto errores, fallos de seguridad y problemas de mantenibilidad. Esta habilidad guía a Claude, Codex y Claude Code mediante pasos de revisión estructurados.
Revisar código con retroalimentación estructurada de IA
por EnactProtocol
La revisión manual de código puede pasar por alto errores, problemas de estilo y patrones riesgosos cuando el contexto es limitado. Esta skill revisa el código proporcionado y devuelve problemas priorizados, sugerencias, un resumen y una puntuación de calidad.
Analizar la calidad de componentes de Claude Code
por C0ntr0lledCha0s
Los equipos necesitan revisiones consistentes antes de publicar componentes de Claude Code. Esta skill puntúa la claridad, los permisos, los disparadores, la seguridad y la usabilidad con orientación concreta para mejorar.