Historial de auditorías
extract-from-pdfs - 5 auditorías
Versión de auditoría 5
Más reciente Riesgo medioJun 28, 2026, 05:51 PM
The static analyzer found many patterns, but most high weak-cryptography, Ruby backtick, and sensitive-file findings are false positives from Markdown, schema text, or normal export code. Medium risk remains because the skill intentionally reads local PDFs, writes datasets, uses API credentials, sends research content to model and validation services, and documents an optional pipe-to-shell installer.
Problemas de riesgo medio (3)
Problemas de riesgo bajo (4)
Factores de riesgo
⚙️ Comandos externos (3)
🌐 Acceso a red (4)
🔑 Variables de entorno (3)
Patrones detectados
Versión de auditoría 4
Riesgo medioJan 16, 2026, 08:30 PM
AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.
Factores de riesgo
⚙️ Comandos externos (288)
🌐 Acceso a red (41)
🔑 Variables de entorno (18)
📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (22)
Patrones detectados
Versión de auditoría 3
Riesgo medioJan 16, 2026, 08:30 PM
AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.
Factores de riesgo
⚙️ Comandos externos (288)
🌐 Acceso a red (41)
🔑 Variables de entorno (18)
📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (22)
Patrones detectados
Versión de auditoría 2
Riesgo bajoJan 11, 2026, 01:11 PM
This is a legitimate scientific research tool for PDF data extraction. All 481 static findings are false positives: JSON Schema syntax misidentified as cryptographic algorithms, shell command examples in documentation flagged as execution patterns, and standard API credential handling flagged as credential access. The skill combines file reading, network requests, and API calls as normal functionality for research data processing.
Factores de riesgo
📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (2)
🌐 Acceso a red (1)
🔑 Variables de entorno (1)
Versión de auditoría 1
Riesgo bajoJan 11, 2026, 01:11 PM
This is a legitimate scientific research tool for PDF data extraction. All 481 static findings are false positives: JSON Schema syntax misidentified as cryptographic algorithms, shell command examples in documentation flagged as execution patterns, and standard API credential handling flagged as credential access. The skill combines file reading, network requests, and API calls as normal functionality for research data processing.