Habilidades w-retro
📦

w-retro

Revisión del contenido r1 Seguro

Review Completed Work and Improve Next Time

Teams often finish tasks without recording what changed, what evidence was missing, or what should improve. This skill produces a concise, task-specific retrospective with up to three practical next steps.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronce

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente
Review the Skillstore skill "w-retro" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "w-retro". We needed to add export filtering. The filter shipped and unit tests passed, but no browser test was run.

Resultado esperado:

Requested versus shipped: Export filtering was added and unit-tested. Evidence gap: Browser behavior was not checked. Next change: Add one browser test for filter selection and downloaded results.

Usando "w-retro". The task was to update the onboarding guide. The guide changed, but the examples were not checked against the current interface.

Resultado esperado:

  • Requested versus shipped: The onboarding guide was updated, but example accuracy was not verified.
  • Process gap: The task lacked a user-interface consistency check.
  • Next changes: Review examples against the current interface and add a lightweight documentation checklist.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro
v1 • 20/9/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

The scanned skill is a 12-line, chat-only retrospective checklist with no executable code or detected security patterns. No prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, or business-logic abuse evidence was found in SKILL.md.

1
Archivos escaneados
12
Líneas analizadas
0
Elementos de revisión
0
Falsos positivos ignorados
La auditoría estática y semántica completada más reciente no detectó hallazgos de seguridad confirmados. Esto no demuestra que el skill no tenga efectos secundarios.
Auditado por: codex
Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado
Evaluación de seguridad

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

blockmatic. (2026). w-retro security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-retro-2026, author = {blockmatic}, title = {w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "blockmatic" date-released: "2026-09-20" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-retro:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio
55
Arquitectura
85
Mantenibilidad
87
Contenido
65
Comunidad
91
Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Close a development task

Review the request, shipped changes, checks, and documentation before closing a coding task.

Improve team delivery

Capture specific process gaps after a sprint item, project milestone, or cross-functional deliverable.

Evaluate an AI-assisted workflow

Compare the requested work with the AI-produced result and record better checks for the next session.

Prueba estos prompts

Basic task retrospective 
Review the completed task in this conversation. State what was requested, what shipped, and one improvement for next time.
Check process gaps 
Run a retrospective on this completed task. Identify skipped checks, unclear requirements, extra scope, and missing documentation. Suggest no more than three specific changes.
Compare plan and outcome 
Compare the original request, plan, implementation, and validation evidence. Explain the most important differences and recommend up to three changes for the next similar task.
Audit an AI-assisted delivery 
Perform a task-specific retrospective of this AI-assisted delivery. Separate outcome gaps from process gaps, cite the available evidence, and prioritize three changes that would improve the next session.

Mejores prácticas

  • Run the skill after checks are complete and the delivered result is known.
  • Provide the original request, completed work, validation evidence, and relevant constraints.
  • Prefer specific recommendations tied to this task over broad process advice.

Evitar

  • Do not use the retrospective as a substitute for implementing a required fix.
  • Do not request generic lessons without sharing task-specific evidence.
  • Do not turn a short retrospective into an unfocused list of every possible improvement.

Preguntas frecuentes

When should I use this skill?
Use it after completing a task and recording the checks or evidence that support the result.
What does the skill review?
It compares the request with the shipped result and checks for process or evidence gaps.
How many improvements does it suggest?
It suggests at most three concrete changes for the next similar task.
Can it change files or create commits?
No. It responds in chat and does not implement changes, commit files, or open pull requests.
What context produces the best result?
Include the request, plan, completed work, validation checks, constraints, and known uncertainties.
Does it replace a formal incident review?
No. It supports routine task learning and does not replace incident, compliance, or security review processes.

Detalles del desarrollador

Licencia

MIT

Revisión de Skillstore

r1

Aviso de versión

El autor no declaró una versión.

Repositorio

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-retro

Ref.

7cd60e5c44d39477abb7a2c00ae0de2cf2a01392

Actualidad del mantenimiento

20/9/2026

Uso

0 descargas · 0 vistas

Estructura de archivos

📄 SKILL.md