Historial de auditorías

Static analysis flagged many command and blocker patterns, but most are Markdown examples, inline file globs, checklist text, or report-format placeholders. The only confirmed behavior is read-only local git inspection with stderr redirected to /dev/null, which is expected for a code review skill and shows no network, credential access, or prompt-injection attempt.

All static analysis findings are false positives. The skill is documentation-only (SKILL.md) describing a legitimate code review workflow. Backticks flagged as shell execution are markdown code formatting. Numeric values flagged as weak crypto are JSON array indices. No executable code exists that poses security risks.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

This skill consists solely of documentation and prompt guidance for performing code reviews. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem operations are defined. The skill describes using git commands for change detection, which is expected behavior for a code review tool.

This skill consists solely of documentation and prompt guidance for performing code reviews. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem operations are defined. The skill describes using git commands for change detection, which is expected behavior for a code review tool.

This skill consists solely of documentation and prompt guidance for performing code reviews. No executable code, scripts, network calls, or filesystem operations are defined. The skill describes using git commands for change detection, which is expected behavior for a code review tool.