스킬 deep-research-framework

📦

deep-research-framework

Name: deep-research-framework
Author: alapha888

콘텐츠 리비전 r1 안전 ⚙️ 외부 명령어

Build Research Reports with Traceable Evidence

Research reports can hide weak sources, stale facts, and unsupported conclusions. This framework guides clear questions, independent verification, and conclusion-first writing with explicit uncertainty.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 브론즈

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 브론즈

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research-framework" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"deep-research-framework" 사용 중입니다. Outline research on whether our team should adopt a new documentation platform.

예상 결과:

Main question: Does the platform meet our documentation requirements?
Sub-questions: What features are documented? What migration work is required? What costs are supported by current evidence?
Primary sources: Official documentation, pricing pages, and measured trial results.
Uncertainty: Actual migration effort and independent corroboration remain unresolved.

"deep-research-framework" 사용 중입니다. Assess a vendor availability claim supported by one undated brochure.

예상 결과:

Conclusion: The vendor availability claim remains a single-source claim.
Evidence: Only one undated vendor brochure was supplied.
Verification gap: No independent measurements or dated supporting documents were provided.
Reassessment condition: Dated operational evidence and independent corroboration could change this conclusion.

보안 감사

안전

v1 • 2026. 10. 6. 버전별 보고서 열기

The static command-execution finding is a false positive: SKILL.md lines 34-51 contain a fenced Markdown report outline. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration intent, or prompt injection in the reviewed skill.

스캔된 파일

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

위험 요인

⚙️ 외부 명령어 (1)

SKILL.md:34-51

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

alapha888. (2026). deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-deep-research-framework-2026,
  author = {alapha888},
  title = {deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "alapha888"
date-released: "2026-10-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:alapha888-deep-research-framework:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Compare Competitors

Structure a competitor comparison around dated product evidence, independent corroboration, and gaps in available information.

Investigate a Technical Topic

Prioritize original papers and official documentation, then distinguish supported conclusions from speculation.

Prepare an Evidence-Based Brief

Organize a policy question into focused sections with traceable sources and explicit uncertainty.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Start a Research Outline

Create a research outline for [topic]. Define one main question, up to three sub-questions, source tiers, and an uncertainty section.

Review Source Quality

Assess these sources for [question]: [sources]. Classify their tiers, check independence, flag undated facts, and identify claims that need corroboration.

Write a Comparative Report

Compare [option A] and [option B] using [provided evidence]. Lead with conclusions, cite numerical claims, date facts, and mark single-source claims.

Audit Conclusions and Uncertainty

Audit this report: [report and sources]. Check source independence, unsupported numbers, speculation, and stale facts. Revise conclusions and state what would invalidate them.

모범 사례

Set the main question and source tiers before gathering information.
Check that corroborating sources do not repeat the same original source.
Date key facts and state missing evidence, speculation, and reassessment conditions.

피하기

Treating social posts or forum discussions as evidence for core conclusions.
Presenting single-source claims, speculation, or undated facts as established current knowledge.
Listing sources without clear conclusions or hiding unresolved questions.

자주 묻는 질문

Does this skill search the web automatically?

It defines a research workflow but includes no search implementation. Browsing depends on the host assistant and available tools.

Which sources should support conclusions?

Use primary sources and reputable secondary sources. Treat social posts, forums, and aggregators as leads rather than evidence.

How many sources does a key conclusion need?

Use at least two independent sources. Multiple sources repeating one origin do not count as independent corroboration.

What happens when only one source exists?

Label the conclusion as a single-source claim and note that independent verification is missing.

How should outdated information be handled?

Date every key fact. Treat undated information as possibly stale and explain how newer evidence could change the conclusion.

What should the final report contain?

Include core conclusions, sections ordered by conclusion, evidence, and sources, plus an uncertainty statement covering missing evidence and reassessment conditions.

개발자 세부 정보

작성자

alapha888

라이선스

MIT

Skillstore 리비전

버전 안내

작성자가 버전을 선언하지 않았습니다.

리포지토리

https://github.com/alapha888/agent-skills-en/tree/f248342d20ae1e47ecfb146ea112a3e76234ff27/skills/deep-research-framework

참조

9bbb9af75d2f5ea5acb8fac5aec75713670a067f

유지보수 최신성

2026. 10. 6.

사용량

0 다운로드 · 0 조회

파일 구조

📄 SKILL.md