un-editorial-check
Review Copy Against UN Editorial Rules
Editorial inconsistencies and sensitive wording are difficult to track across documents and websites. This skill checks extracted English copy and separates rule violations from human review.
Detente y solicita confirmación antes de instalar.
Revisa el plan y obtén el consentimiento explícito del usuario antes de modificar archivos.
Instalar con mi Agente
Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "un-editorial-check" from https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.
Recursos legibles por agentes
Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.
Pruébalo
Usando "un-editorial-check". Draft text: The color of the cover was noted.
Resultado esperado:
- Deterministic spelling finding: color.
- Suggested wording: colour.
- The checker reports the matching rule and source. The draft remains unchanged until an approved fix is applied.
Usando "un-editorial-check". An image-only PDF with no recoverable text.
Resultado esperado:
- Extraction refused: the document appears to contain scanned images without extractable text.
- The run returns exit code 2. The document is not reported as checked or clean.
Usando "un-editorial-check". A claim-register entry contains a source but no reference date.
Resultado esperado:
- Human review required: record the reference date for the registered claim.
- Register completeness does not establish that the claim is true.
Auditoría de seguridad
Riesgo altoOf 400 supplied findings, 394 are false positives; six confirm unsafe baseline creation or blocking special-file reads, with additional PDF denial-of-service risk. No evidence found of prompt injection or intentional data exfiltration in reviewed context. Review was capped at 400 of 5,037 matches; the remaining 4,637 require manual review before automatic publication. Static review was capped at 400/5037 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
Preocupaciones de seguridad confirmadas (1)
Elementos de revisión de capacidades (6)
Estas son capacidades locales reales que pueden esperarse para esta habilidad, por lo que requieren revisión, pero no se cuentan como comportamiento malicioso confirmado.
Factores de riesgo
⚙️ Comandos externos (50)
📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (50)
🔑 Variables de entorno (12)
🌐 Acceso a red (50)
⚡ Contiene scripts (50)
Compartir y citar este informe
Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.
Copiar enlace del informe
https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportInsignia Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Insignia HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Tarjeta para insertar
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Cita APA
ahaomar. (2026). un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.7.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1Cita BibTeX
@techreport{ahaomar-ahaomar-un-editorial-check-2026,
author = {ahaomar},
title = {un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.7.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.7.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "ahaomar"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:ahaomar-un-editorial-check:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Puntuación de Skillstore
Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: MedioLo que puedes crear
Review Institutional Publications
Check briefing papers for spelling, dates, terminology, and sensitive wording while preserving source references for editorial decisions.
Check Product Interface Copy
Review visible HTML and supported JavaScript copy before release, with optional publishing or accessibility findings reported separately.
Track Evidence Review
Create a claim register for detected figures and comparisons, then check source and reference-date completeness after human review.
Prueba estos prompts
Review [draft.md] with un-editorial-check. Report deterministic violations separately from findings requiring human review. Do not modify the file.
Check [document.pdf] and write an HTML review report to [report.html]. Preserve rule sources and PDF page references. State extraction refusals clearly.
Show the target files in [content-directory]. Preview deterministic fixes for eligible prose files. Request approval before applying changes, then review the resulting diff.
Check [content-directory] using [organization-profile.json] and [claims.json]. Compare [baseline.json] and export SARIF. Keep optional audit findings separate from editorial failures.
Mejores prácticas
- Keep rule sources, confidence labels, and human-review recommendations attached to each finding.
- Show target files and preview corrections before approving writes; review every resulting diff.
- Use isolated, resource-limited processing for untrusted documents and review every extraction refusal.
Evitar
- Treating a clean run as factual verification, legal clearance, or United Nations approval.
- Automatically rewriting sensitive terminology, claims, or diplomatic language from heuristic findings.
- Using watch mode in CI or relying on optional audit findings to determine the process exit code.
Preguntas frecuentes
Which assistants can use this skill?
Does it verify facts or provide United Nations approval?
Which files can it review?
Will it rewrite my documents automatically?
Does it retrieve pages or upload my documents?
What do exit codes mean?
Detalles del desarrollador
Autor
ahaomarLicencia
MIT
Versión del autor
v1.7.0
Revisión de Skillstore
r1
Repositorio
https://github.com/ahaomar/un-editorial-check/tree/376d68d3408673fe1f4a30bb53d82f4eba36cc64/Ref.
03d5e23fbf7bb87a093ed68c17ce9b3dd9b9934b
Actualidad del mantenimiento
2/10/2026
Uso
0 descargas · 0 vistas
Estructura de archivos
📁 .github/
📄 ci.yml
📁 action/
📄 main.mjs
📁 agents/
📁 bin/
📁 config/
📄 generic-british-english.json
📁 docs/
📁 assets/
📄 un-editorial-check-banner.jpeg
📁 demo/
📁 fonts/
📁 lib/
📄 cli.mjs
📄 fix.mjs
📄 html.mjs
📄 init.mjs
📄 pdf.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 LICENSE
📁 rules/
📁 scripts/
📄 SKILL.md
📄 codex.md
📁 social/
📁 tests/
📁 audits/
📁 demo/
📁 fix/
📁 lanes/
📄 web-p0-incoherent-insertion.html
📄 mixed.js
📄 re002.js
📁 lib/
📄 run.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 VERSION