Habilidades agents-md-audit

📦

agents-md-audit

Name: agents-md-audit
Author: agentkitco

v1.0 Revisión del contenido r2 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Audit Agent Instructions for Accuracy and Clarity

Stale commands, broken paths, and vague rules make agent instructions unreliable. This skill combines local heuristic checks with evidence-based review and proposes shorter instructions before approved edits.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 76 Adecuado

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 76 Adecuado

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente

Review the Skillstore skill "agents-md-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "agents-md-audit". Audit an instruction file containing a missing script reference and an obsolete directory.

Resultado esperado:

Must fix: The documented script has no matching definition in the repository manifest.
Must fix: The referenced directory does not exist at the documented location.
Not verified: Deployment was not run because it can change external state.
Proposed version: Remove obsolete references and retain verified instructions, pending owner approval.

Usando "agents-md-audit". Review a long instruction file with repeated rules and a possible secret.

Resultado esperado:

Must fix: A possible secret was detected. Its value is omitted; remove it and rotate it if real.
Should trim: A repeated rule duplicates an earlier instruction.
Should trim: Replace vague quality language with a testable requirement.
Proposed version: Keep unique hard constraints and move relevant rules into scoped files.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro

v2 • 22/10/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

All 13 static findings are false positives involving regex literals, comments, Markdown formatting, dictionary access, or report placeholders. The checker reads local files and reports heuristics without executing extracted commands; the workflow separately permits safe command verification. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential extraction, or network exfiltration in the reviewed files.

Archivos escaneados

250

Líneas analizadas

Elementos de revisión

Falsos positivos ignorados

Factores de riesgo

⚙️ Comandos externos (10)

scripts/audit_instructions.py:26 scripts/audit_instructions.py:27 scripts/audit_instructions.py:29 scripts/audit_instructions.py:98-147 scripts/audit_instructions.py:147-153 SKILL.md:16 SKILL.md:18 SKILL.md:19 SKILL.md:20 SKILL.md:31-49

La auditoría estática y semántica completada más reciente no detectó hallazgos de seguridad confirmados. Esto no demuestra que el skill no tenga efectos secundarios.

Auditado por: codex Ver historial de auditorías →

Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

agentkitco. (2026). agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-agents-md-audit-2026,
  author = {agentkitco},
  title = {agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {2},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2},
  note = {Author version 1.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "agents-md-audit security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "agentkitco"
date-released: "2026-10-22"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-agents-md-audit/audits/2"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:agentkitco-agents-md-audit:audit:2"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio

Arquitectura

Mantenibilidad

Contenido

Comunidad

Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Refresh Repository Instructions

Find stale commands and missing paths after repository changes, then propose corrections with supporting evidence.

Reconcile Agent Rules

Compare instruction files for conflicting requirements and identify rules better suited to specific paths.

Review Instructions Before Sharing

Check for possible secrets, leftover placeholders, and unclear rules without repeating sensitive values in the report.

Prueba estos prompts

Review One Instruction File

Audit AGENTS.md for broken paths, vague wording, placeholders, and possible secrets. Report findings without editing files or running project commands.

Check Command References

Review CLAUDE.md command references against repository definitions. Identify missing scripts and targets, and mark commands you cannot safely verify.

Compare Instruction Files

Find repository agent instruction files. Compare their rules for contradictions, duplicates, and scope problems, citing file names and line numbers.

Prepare a Shorter Revision

Audit all discovered instruction files. Propose shorter versions that preserve hard constraints and incident-based rules. Wait for approval before editing.

Mejores prácticas

Run the checker from the intended repository root and supply the instruction files explicitly.
Inspect project command definitions and use a trusted environment before running verification commands.
Require evidence for corrections, redact possible secrets, and approve proposed edits before applying them.

Evitar

Treating a clean heuristic report as proof that every instruction is correct.
Running deployment, migration, or deletion commands merely to verify documentation.
Removing incident-based rules or hard constraints solely to reduce file length.

Preguntas frecuentes

Which instruction formats can I review?

The workflow covers AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Claude rule files, Cursor rules, and GitHub Copilot instruction files.

Does the checker execute commands from instruction files?

No. It compares command references with local definitions. The separate review workflow permits safe verification commands and excludes deployment, migration, and deletion.

Does the skill edit files automatically?

The workflow requires an audit report and proposed revision, then waits for approval before editing.

What does the Python checker require?

It uses Python 3.8 or later and only standard-library modules. The instructions provide manual checking as a fallback.

Can it guarantee that no secrets remain?

No. It detects selected secret patterns. Review flagged values privately, omit them from reports, and rotate credentials when exposure is real.

How are contradictions and unclear rules handled?

The assistant reviews these manually, cites conflicting instructions, and proposes clearer wording. The script does not resolve semantic contradictions.