Historial de auditorías

All five static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code formatting, not executable shell calls. I found no prompt injection, data exfiltration, or hidden execution intent in SKILL.md or scripts/run.py. The template declares Python Bash access, but the reviewed content uses it only for a simple self-test entrypoint.

All five static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code formatting, not executable shell calls. I found no prompt injection, data exfiltration, or hidden execution intent in SKILL.md or scripts/run.py. The template declares Python Bash access, but the reviewed content uses it only for a simple self-test entrypoint.

Static analysis reported weak cryptography and shell execution patterns, but those specific matches are false positives in documentation text and an argparse description. The skill does declare Bash(python:*) permission and includes a simple Python entrypoint, so the remaining risk is low and tied to bounded script execution.

This is a benign boilerplate template skill. All 25 static findings are false positives triggered by documentation references and metadata. The only code is a 23-line Python script that parses CLI arguments. No network access, no credential handling, no dangerous operations.

This is a benign boilerplate template skill. All 25 static findings are false positives triggered by documentation references and metadata. The only code is a 23-line Python script that parses CLI arguments. No network access, no credential handling, no dangerous operations.

Template skill with minimal capabilities. Contains a simple Python entrypoint script that only parses CLI arguments and runs self-tests. The Bash(python:*) tool permission is appropriate for a skill designed to execute scripts. No network, file I/O, or credential access detected.