📦

typesafe-ai

Name: typesafe-ai
Author: typesafe-ai

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher ⚙️ Externe Befehle🌐 Netzwerkzugriff

Build Typed AI Decisions with TypeSafe

Many application features need semantic judgments, but free-form model responses are difficult to combine reliably in code. TypeSafe helps developers design small typed judgments and compose them into routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive workflows.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage

Review the Skillstore skill "typesafe-ai" from https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/lockfile

Testen

„typesafe-ai“ wird verwendet. A support application must route incoming messages to a known team and fill the team-specific fields.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Use a routing judgment to select a team and a separate typed judgment for branch-specific arguments. Ask only the questions relevant to the selected branch, then let application code execute the handoff.

„typesafe-ai“ wird verwendet. A search workflow has many retrieved candidates and needs reliable context for an answer.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Retrieve candidates in code, judge relevance with comparable scores, select useful evidence, and send uncertain or failing cases to verification or human review.

„typesafe-ai“ wird verwendet. A product team wants to replace a broad prompt that returns parsed text.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Split the broad request into narrow judgments with explicit criteria, named state fields, typed outputs, a no-match result, and tests for representative cases.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher

v1 • 17.9.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All 26 static findings are false positives. The flagged backticks are Markdown examples, the URLs are documentation links, and the fallback guidance does not perform system reconnaissance; no semantic security findings were identified.

Gescannte Dateien

172

Analysierte Zeilen

Prüfelemente

Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

⚙️ Externe Befehle (3)

SKILL.md:34 SKILL.md:37 SKILL.md:110

🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (22)

Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.

Geprüft von: claude

Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

typesafe-ai. (2026). typesafe-ai security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai-2026,
  author = {typesafe-ai},
  title = {typesafe-ai security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "typesafe-ai security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "typesafe-ai"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:typesafe-ai-typesafe-ai:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel

Architektur

Wartbarkeit

Inhalt

Gemeinschaft

Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Plan semantic application features

Turn a product behavior into focused judgments, typed outputs, and bounded application actions.

Design evidence and review workflows

Combine retrieval, relevance judgments, confidence thresholds, verification, and human escalation.

Improve an existing model integration

Replace broad prompt-and-parse steps with reusable primitives, explicit state, and testable composition.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Find the right judgment

I am building [feature]. It must [observable behavior]. Identify the smallest semantic judgment it needs, the relevant state, and a suitable TypeSafe primitive. Keep deterministic rules in code.

Choose a primitive

For this decision, compare Choice, Noul, and Score: [decision]. Define what each output means, when each primitive fits, and what no-match or uncertainty outcome the application needs.

Compose a workflow

Design a TypeSafe workflow for [goal]. Separate observed state, inferred state, policies, and execution. Identify independent questions that can run together, dependent follow-up steps, thresholds, and human escalation.

Audit a production design

Review this proposed semantic workflow: [design]. Check question scope, candidate coverage, state freshness, confidence interpretation, policy handling, latency and cost, failure categories, test cases, and the boundary between model judgments and application code.

Bewährte Praktiken

Start from the application behavior, then define the smallest judgment that supports it.
Keep rules, calculations, lookups, execution, and authorization in deterministic code.
Test judgments and resulting behavior with representative data, thresholds, and failure cases.

Vermeiden

Do not use a model judgment for exact rules, arithmetic, lookups, or permission enforcement.
Do not treat confidence as proof of correctness or reuse example thresholds without validation.
Do not send stale inferred state into actions without checking the current application state.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

What is TypeSafe used for?

It helps developers add focused semantic judgments to software for routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive decisions.

Which primitive should I choose?

Use Choice for one option, Noul for whether a condition holds, and Score for a degree along a defined dimension.

Does this skill write integration code?

It provides design guidance and points to API and SDK documentation. It does not implement or execute an integration.

How should I handle uncertainty?

Define thresholds using target data and consequences, include no-match outcomes, and escalate uncertain or failing cases when appropriate.

Can TypeSafe replace application logic?

No. Keep deterministic rules, calculations, lookups, execution, authorization, and workflow control in code.

What should I test?

Test representative inputs, state freshness, questions, candidates, outputs, composition, thresholds, service failures, and observed application behavior.