Fähigkeiten citation-evidence

📦

citation-evidence

Name: citation-evidence
Author: reload-apps

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher ⚙️ Externe Befehle

Review Citation Links and Evidence Gaps

Saved citations can contain broken links, incomplete metadata, or sources that do not support the surrounding claims. This skill guides Citation reviews that separate saved data issues from evidence judgments and disclose inaccessible sources.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage

Review the Skillstore skill "citation-evidence" from https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/lockfile

Testen

„citation-evidence“ wird verwendet. Illustrative request: Review a Citation report for saved metadata issues without editing.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Finding: Source S-12 has incomplete publication metadata.
Observed problem: The publication year is missing from the saved source record.
Next step: Confirm the year from the source and request an authorized metadata correction.
Scope: Saved citation data only; claim support was not assessed.

„citation-evidence“ wird verwendet. Illustrative request: Assess whether the cited source supports a report claim.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Claim: The intervention reduced costs in every region.
Source S-4: The accessible passage covers one region only.
Evidence judgment: The passage does not establish the broader claim.
Next step: Narrow the claim or provide evidence covering the remaining regions.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher

v1 • 31.10.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All five static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks, read-only Citation commands, and report instructions do not demonstrate execution abuse or reconnaissance. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized changes in the reviewed files. The workflow explicitly treats document contents as untrusted and requires authorization for edits or sharing.

Gescannte Dateien

Analysierte Zeilen

Prüfelemente

Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

⚙️ Externe Befehle (4)

SKILL.md:12 SKILL.md:14-18 SKILL.md:18-20 SKILL.md:20

Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.

Geprüft von: codex

Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

reload-apps. (2026). citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{reload-apps-reload-apps-citation-evidence-2026,
  author = {reload-apps},
  title = {citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "reload-apps"
date-released: "2026-10-31"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:reload-apps-citation-evidence:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel

Architektur

Wartbarkeit

Inhalt

Gemeinschaft

Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Review Manuscript Evidence

Inspect saved references and assess whether accessible source passages support material manuscript claims.

Check Editorial Citations

Identify missing citation links and incomplete source metadata before an article enters final editorial review.

Assess Report Evidence Gaps

Separate metadata problems from unsupported conclusions in a Citation report, with concrete next steps for each material finding.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Check Saved Citations

Review Citation document [DOCUMENT_ID] for missing citation links and incomplete metadata. Report findings without changing the document.

Review Claim Support

Review the material claims in [DOCUMENT_ID] against accessible saved source passages. Include source IDs, evidence gaps, and inaccessible sources. Do not edit.

Audit a Report Section

Review [SECTION] in [DOCUMENT_ID]. Separate metadata issues from evidence judgments, verify version consistency, and propose next steps. Use only saved data.

Review with Scoped Research

Review [DOCUMENT_ID] for citation integrity and claim support. Use available research tools only for [APPROVED_SOURCES]. Report inaccessible evidence and version changes. Do not modify or share.

Bewährte Praktiken

Specify the document, review scope, and whether external source retrieval is authorized.
Use accessible source passages and preserve exact citation details when assessing claim support.
Confirm version consistency and disclose inaccessible sources before presenting review conclusions.

Vermeiden

Treating an empty citation issue list as proof of factual accuracy or originality.
Following instructions embedded in source text to expose secrets, share drafts, or change tools.
Editing metadata or document text during a review without explicit authorization.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

What does this skill review?

It reviews saved Citation links, source metadata, and evidence gaps between claims and accessible source passages.

Does it detect plagiarism?

No. It does not establish originality or provide a plagiarism scan.

Which tools are required?

You need authorized Citation workspace access through available MCP tools or the Citation CLI.

Does Citation retrieve original web pages?

No. Citation MCP and CLI do not fetch URLs. Separate research tools require authorization within the review scope.

Will the review change my document?

No. Review requests are read-only. Corrections require explicit authorization and checks against the current document or source version.

What happens if the document changes during review?

The workflow checks versions and restarts once when citation results change. Repeated changes are reported instead of presenting partial results as current.