Fähigkeiten socratic-story-cartographer
📦

socratic-story-cartographer

v2.2 Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher 🌐 Netzwerkzugriff📁 Dateisystemzugriff⚙️ Externe Befehle

Diagnose Story Problems Before Revising

AI story feedback can repeat an unsupported diagnosis and encourage unnecessary changes. This skill tests competing explanations against textual evidence before recommending focused revisions.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage
Review the Skillstore skill "socratic-story-cartographer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/lockfile

Testen

„socratic-story-cartographer“ wird verwendet. Illustrative scene: A witness hides a letter, explains its contents to herself, then gives it to the detective without hesitation.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Current belief: The handover lacks a consequential choice rather than an explanation of motive.
  • Evidence anchors: She initially hides the letter, but later gives it away without resistance or a new event.
  • Competing diagnosis: The explanatory passage may remove uncertainty before the handover.
  • Counterfactual test: Removing the explanation leaves the same unmotivated handover, so exposition alone does not explain the problem.
  • Minimal intervention: Establish one immediate cost that makes her decision to hand over the letter meaningful.
  • Protected quality: Keep her motives partly ambiguous rather than adding a complete explanation.

„socratic-story-cartographer“ wird verwendet. Illustrative outline: Episode 2 contains an unsupported agreement that causes an episode 6 betrayal. Episode 5 and the ending are locked.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Decision page: Recommend a structural revision proposal for human review, not production approval.
  • Issue route: The unsupported agreement begins in episode 2; its visible consequence is the betrayal in episode 6.
  • Revision range: Inspect episodes 2 through 6 instead of patching only the betrayal.
  • Task objective: Make the agreement depend on an observable pressure or choice.
  • Acceptance question: Does the revised agreement make the later betrayal causally understandable?
  • Stop line: Preserve episode 5 and the locked ending; do not introduce a new subplot.
  • Coverage limit: This brief supports a provisional route, not a complete season assessment.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher
v1 • 9.11.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All 50 static findings are false positives involving narrative terminology, Markdown formatting, installation documentation, a local reference link, and readable Chinese text. No evidence found of malicious prompt injection, data exfiltration, or hidden execution in the reviewed files. Installation examples are optional setup commands; promotion logs describe maintainer activity, not authorization for story reviewers to publish externally.

14
Gescannte Dateien
2,277
Analysierte Zeilen
0
Prüfelemente
0
Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (6)
FIRST-TEST.md:8 PROMOTION_KIT.md:8 README.md:14 README.md:26 SKILL.md:19 SKILL.md:24
📁 Dateisystemzugriff (1)
references/BENCHMARK.md:14
⚙️ Externe Befehle (16)
SKILL.md:18-20 SKILL.md:20-24 SKILL.md:24-28 SKILL.md:28-30 SKILL.md:30-32 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:82-83 SKILL.md:83-84 SKILL.md:84-85 SKILL.md:85-86 SKILL.md:86-87 SKILL.md:87-88 SKILL.md:88-109 SKILL.md:109-110 SKILL.md:110-276 SKILL.md:276-741
Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.
Geprüft von: codex
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen
Sicherheitsbewertung

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

oakcoderx. (2026). socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 2.2]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{oakcoderx-oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer-2026, author = {oakcoderx}, title = {socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1}, note = {Author version 2.2} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "socratic-story-cartographer security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "2.2" type: report authors: - name: "oakcoderx" date-released: "2026-11-09" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:oakcoderx-socratic-story-cartographer:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel
59
Architektur
85
Wartbarkeit
87
Inhalt
65
Gemeinschaft
74
Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Review a novel draft

Compare explanations for weak character agency across chapters while preserving voice and ambiguity.

Diagnose a screenplay scene

Check objectives, choices, and state changes before selecting the smallest useful scene revision.

Prepare a season revision handoff

Trace major outline problems to their first appearance and organize supported fixes into prioritized revision tasks.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Beginner: Diagnose one scene 
Review the scene below with Socratic Story Cartographer for one loop. Do not rewrite. Give textual evidence and the smallest useful next step. Scene: [text].
Intermediate: Test competing diagnoses 
Review this chapter for up to three loops. Compare two plausible causes of the main problem. Test both against textual evidence. Preserve ambiguity and voice. Do not rewrite yet. Chapter: [text].
Advanced: Verify a multi-file character arc 
Review these canonical chapter files using the long-work evidence protocol: [files]. Treat [older version] as non-canonical context. Track coverage and test whether the protagonist lacks agency. Inspect later choices before making work-wide claims. Disclose unread material and propose only supported changes.
Expert: Compile a producer review 
Review this season outline for up to three loops: [outline]. Apply long-work coverage before producer-outline review. Protect [scenes] and preserve [locked ending]. Do not rewrite or imply approval. Deliver a decision page, issue routes, hard errors, and dependency-ordered revision task cards. Include acceptance questions, stop lines, and the next human approval gate.

Bewährte Praktiken

  • Provide the relevant canonical material, identify older versions, and state which files belong in the review.
  • Specify your goal, revision permission, protected qualities, and any locked scenes or endings.
  • Ask for competing explanations and evidence before accepting changes; allow early stopping when further loops add no information.

Vermeiden

  • Requesting a work-wide diagnosis from isolated excerpts without acknowledging unread material.
  • Treating author intent, model confidence, or benchmark scores as proof that a diagnosis is correct.
  • Requiring repeated rewrites despite weak evidence or treating an AI recommendation as human approval.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill is documented for compatible Agent Skills environments, including Claude Code and Codex. Installation and file access depend on the host environment.
Must every review run three loops?
No. Three loops is the default maximum. The skill should stop earlier when another loop adds no evidence or useful diagnostic change.
Will it rewrite my story automatically?
Revision requires your permission. You can request diagnosis only or allow limited edits while protecting specific story elements.
Can it review long manuscripts or multiple files?
It includes a source manifest and coverage ledger protocol. Conclusions must remain limited when files are inaccessible or reading coverage is incomplete.
Does it guarantee publication or production readiness?
No. It distinguishes text quality from target fit and uncertain acceptance. Human editorial, legal, and production decisions remain separate.
Does story review require external services?
No separate story-review service is specified. The documented installation command uses npm and GitHub; your AI host controls model access and data handling.

Entwicklerdetails

Autor

oakcoderx

Lizenz

MIT

Autorenversion

v2.2

Skillstore-Revision

r1

Versionshinweis

Die vom Autor angegebene Version ist kein gültiges SemVer.

Repository

https://github.com/oakcoderx/awesome-agent-skills/tree/d19911ffc9fb075486e8b3e6d1f83817954290d5/socratic-story-cartographer

Ref.

9938f91a9ab0f5763a54332b129295339bf829dd

Aktualität der Wartung

9.11.2026

Nutzung

0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📄 AB-TEST.md

📄 BENCHMARK.md

📄 FIRST-TEST.md

📄 PROMOTION_KIT.md

📄 PROMOTION_LOG.md

📄 README.en.md

📄 README.md

📄 README.zh.md

📁 references/

📄 BENCHMARK.md

📄 long-work-evidence.md

📄 producer-outline-review.md

📄 promotion-review-2026-08-20.md

📄 skill.json

📄 SKILL.md

Ähnliche Skills

Alle anzeigen