gpt-series-reasoning-style
Verify AI Deliverables with Evidence
AI work can appear complete before the result is opened, tested, or checked against the request. This skill adds staged planning, real-environment verification, and honest completion levels.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "gpt-series-reasoning-style" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„gpt-series-reasoning-style“ wird verwendet. Build a small dashboard and tell me when it is finished.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
The dashboard is implemented. I opened it in the target environment, checked the main interaction, and verified the displayed totals. Mobile layout and external data refresh remain unverified.
„gpt-series-reasoning-style“ wird verwendet. Have two agents research and implement this feature.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Research agent: documented assumptions and acceptance checks.
- Implementation agent: completed the feature and supplied the changed files.
- Review: opened the integrated result and checked the critical path.
- Status: C1 verified; stakeholder approval is still required for C2.
„gpt-series-reasoning-style“ wird verwendet. Confirm that this report is correct.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
The report matches the requested structure and its key figures were recalculated. Source freshness and business acceptance were not independently verified.
Sicherheitsaudit
SicherAll 91 static findings were adjudicated as false positives because they reference public metadata, documentation, fixed repository paths, or analysis heuristics rather than executed behavior. No prompt-injection text, data-exfiltration intent, or runtime command execution was evidenced in the reviewed files.
Risikofaktoren
🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (12)
📁 Dateisystemzugriff (41)
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
jadeyingwah. (2026). gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6) [Author version 1.6.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{jadeyingwah-jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style-2026,
author = {jadeyingwah},
title = {gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {6},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6},
note = {Author version 1.6.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)"
version: "1.6.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "jadeyingwah"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style:audit:6"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Review a Code Change
Ask an engineer or coding agent to implement a change, run focused checks, open the result, and report verified and unverified paths.
Coordinate Multiple Agents
Use staged planning and explicit handoffs when several agents divide research, implementation, testing, or review.
Validate a Client Deliverable
Track whether a document, design, or analysis matches the request and distinguish technical completion from stakeholder approval.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Complete this task, then open the actual result and list what you verified, what remains unverified, and whether the request is complete.
Plan this task in clear stages. Identify the required checks and the real environment where the final result must be opened before you implement it.
Review this completed change against the original request. Recalculate important numbers, open the output, test the critical path, and mark every unverified claim.
Break this project into independent agent roles. Define handoff evidence, assign a reviewer, verify the integrated result in its real environment, and report the appropriate C1 or C2 status.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Define the evidence required for completion before implementation begins.
- Open and use the delivered result in the environment that matters.
- State verified facts, unverified paths, and completion level separately.
Vermeiden
- Do not declare completion from code inspection alone.
- Do not treat a green check as proof that the guarded failure case works.
- Do not label a result C2 without user or external confirmation.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
What does this skill verify?
Does it run tests automatically?
What is C1?
What is C2?
Can it coordinate multiple agents?
Which tools support it?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
jadeyingwahLizenz
MIT
Autorenversion
v1.6.0
Skillstore-Revision
r6
Ref.
ca840d3e968d0e2f0cfde9943dd7e35a0878a763
Aktualität der Wartung
20.9.2026
Nutzung
3 Downloads · 18 Aufrufe