gjalla-test-audit
Audit Test Suites for False Confidence
Weak tests can hide production bugs while inflating coverage metrics. This skill reviews test quality and identifies misleading, redundant, or excessively mocked tests.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "gjalla-test-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„gjalla-test-audit“ wird verwendet. Audit the account service tests for tautological database mocks.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
Tier 2 finding: three tests return hardcoded database rows and assert those same values. Replace them with database-backed behavior tests.
„gjalla-test-audit“ wird verwendet. Find tests that do not exercise production code.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Tier 1: The test recreates the source decision logic locally.
- Evidence: The test imports no production module.
- Action: Remove the duplicate logic test after approval and add a source-level test.
„gjalla-test-audit“ wird verwendet. Review overlapping unit and integration tests.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
Tier 3 finding: the mocked unit test duplicates the stronger database-backed scenario. Keep unique edge cases and remove redundant coverage after approval.
Sicherheitsaudit
SicherAll 15 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline-code formatting around test identifiers and examples. The source defines a review workflow and requires approval before cleanup actions. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, command execution, or network reconnaissance intent was found.
Risikofaktoren
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
gjalla. (2026). gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{gjalla-gjalla-gjalla-test-audit-2026,
author = {gjalla},
title = {gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "gjalla"
date-released: "2026-08-11"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:gjalla-gjalla-test-audit:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Review a legacy test suite
Find tests that inflate confidence without protecting current production behavior.
Harden a risky subsystem
Compare critical source paths with tests and identify missing realistic coverage.
Improve quality governance
Classify weak tests and create a prioritized remediation report for the team.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Audit the test suite in [directory]. Identify placeholder tests, tests without source imports, and obvious duplicated coverage. Report findings without changing files.
Review tests for [component]. Compare each test with its source code. Flag tautological mocks and explain which production defects each test cannot detect.
Audit tests covering [critical path]. Rank gaps by production impact, identify encoded bugs, and recommend realistic integration or round-trip tests.
Audit [test scope] across all test layers. Classify findings into deletion and replacement tiers. Estimate coverage impact and propose approved cleanup waves.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Provide the relevant test files and production source files together.
- Prioritize security boundaries, data access, and core business logic.
- Run tests and coverage between approved cleanup waves.
Vermeiden
- Do not judge test quality from coverage percentages alone.
- Do not remove weak tests before identifying replacement coverage.
- Do not classify mocked tests without comparing their behavior to production code.