dbs-resonate
Diagnose Audience Resonance in Your Draft
A finished draft can contain clear ideas yet fail to connect with its intended audience. This skill locates specific resonance gaps and recommends focused edits using communication theory.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "dbs-resonate" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„dbs-resonate“ wird verwendet. Audience: first-time team leads. Draft: Everyone should communicate better. Good leaders are confident. Before assigning work, agree on the deadline and expected result.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Core issue: Broad advice obscures a useful action for first-time team leads.
- Central claim: Agree on deadlines and expected results before assigning work.
- Primary theory: Uses and gratifications. Practical usefulness is weak because generic claims delay the actionable guidance.
- Delete: 'Good leaders are confident.' It introduces a separate claim without support.
- Strengthen: Replace 'Everyone' with a concrete situation involving first-time team leads.
- Retain: The final sentence. Revised outline: assignment confusion, agreement on expectations, one practical example.
„dbs-resonate“ wird verwendet. Audience: new freelancers. Draft: Late payments are frustrating. Clients are difficult. You should manage your business professionally.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Core issue: The draft names frustration without explaining its cause or giving readers control.
- Central claim: Unclear payment expectations can leave new freelancers uncertain about their next step.
- Primary theory: Emotional appraisal. The mechanism is weak because responsibility and control remain unspecified.
- Delete or qualify: 'Clients are difficult.' The draft provides no evidence for this generalization.
- Strengthen: Describe a specific unpaid invoice and clarify what action the freelancer can take.
- Revised outline: concrete payment problem, its effect on planning, one actionable response.
Sicherheitsaudit
SicherAll eight static findings are false positives: Markdown delimiters, local skill references, a scholarly DOI, and readable Chinese text. No evidence found of command execution, network transmission, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.
Risikofaktoren
⚙️ Externe Befehle (4)
🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (1)
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
dontbesilent2025. (2026). dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{dontbesilent2025-dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate-2026,
author = {dontbesilent2025},
title = {dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "dontbesilent2025"
date-released: "2026-10-28"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Clarify a creator script
Locate vague audience references and competing claims in an existing video script, then prioritize concrete revisions.
Strengthen an educational article
Check whether an article gives readers a clear practical use and identify sentences that need stronger explanations.
Focus an organizational message
Review whether an internal draft connects employee concerns to one central claim and a clear intended action.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Review this draft for audience resonance: [draft]. Identify the central claim, quote the weakest passages, and suggest specific edits.
My audience is [audience], and I want them to [action]. Diagnose this draft: [draft]. Flag vague identity references and missing practical value.
Analyze [draft] for [audience]. Select one primary theory, quote supporting evidence, rate the mechanism, and explain missing conditions without predicting platform results.
Audit [draft] for [audience] seeking [action]. List claims and justify one primary theory. Provide deletion, compression, strengthening, retention, and one revised outline.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Provide the complete draft, intended audience, and one desired audience response.
- Require quotations for each diagnosis and keep one primary theory unless separate evidence supports another.
- Apply focused edits first, then validate audience response through real feedback rather than assumed platform outcomes.
Vermeiden
- Requesting guaranteed virality, platform metrics, or commercial forecasts from a text diagnosis.
- Submitting only a topic and expecting a complete article or opening script.
- Adding emotional pressure or sharing triggers when the draft only needs to support understanding or saving.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
What should I provide?
Will it rewrite the entire draft?
Can it predict whether my content will go viral?
Which theories can guide the review?
Does the skill require network access or shell commands?
Can it explain why an already published post succeeded?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
dontbesilent2025Lizenz
MIT
Skillstore-Revision
r1
Versionshinweis
Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.
Ref.
8322ecc54632436d19d804491fe0bc4bbf7e1d32
Aktualität der Wartung
28.10.2026
Nutzung
0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe
Dateistruktur