Fähigkeiten cc-best-practices

📦

cc-best-practices

Name: cc-best-practices
Author: dboeckli

Inhaltsrevision r1 Mittleres Risiko ⚙️ Externe Befehle📁 Dateisystemzugriff🌐 Netzwerkzugriff

Improve Claude Code Workflows

Unclear prompts and crowded sessions reduce coding quality. This skill provides practical workflows for planning, verification, context control, automation, and independent review.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 71 Angemessen

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 71 Angemessen

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage

Review the Skillstore skill "cc-best-practices" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/lockfile

Testen

„cc-best-practices“ wird verwendet. Help me ask Claude to fix an intermittent login failure.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Investigate login failures after session timeout. Inspect authentication refresh logic, add a reproducing test, implement the fix, and report test evidence.

„cc-best-practices“ wird verwendet. My session is long, and Claude repeats the same mistake.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Record the missing constraint and any useful evidence.
Clear the unrelated conversation context.
Start again with the constraint, affected files, expected behavior, and a verification command.

„cc-best-practices“ wird verwendet. How should my team review a large refactor?

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Use one session to implement the approved plan and another fresh session to inspect the diff, edge cases, and verification results.

Sicherheitsaudit

Mittleres Risiko

v1 • 26.9.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All 43 static alerts are false positives: the script uses fixed local validation commands, while the documentation alerts identify Markdown or benign examples. Two contextual risks remain because examples recommend sending logs to Claude and enabling broad unattended execution without adequate cautions.

Gescannte Dateien

371

Analysierte Zeilen

Prüfelemente

Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Bestätigte Sicherheitsbedenken (2)

Mittel

SKILL.md:142-145

Potential Sensitive Log Disclosure

The skill recommends piping an error log to Claude without advising users to review or redact secrets and personal data first.

The explicit log piping example can transmit complete log contents to an external model service, and no nearby redaction warning is present.

Mittel

SKILL.md:229-249 references/commands.md:31-38

Overbroad Unattended Automation Guidance

Examples allow editing and wildcard git commits, then recommend auto permission mode without requiring review before persistent changes.

The documented commands explicitly grant broad edit and git commit access and promote uninterrupted auto mode, creating clear unintended-change risk.

Risikofaktoren

⚙️ Externe Befehle (38)

📁 Dateisystemzugriff (2)

scripts/validate-claude-md.sh:10 scripts/validate-claude-md.sh:8

🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (1)

SKILL.md:10

Geprüft von: codex

Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

dboeckli. (2026). cc-best-practices security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{dboeckli-dboeckli-cc-best-practices-2026,
  author = {dboeckli},
  title = {cc-best-practices security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cc-best-practices security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "dboeckli"
date-released: "2026-09-26"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dboeckli-cc-best-practices/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:dboeckli-cc-best-practices:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel

Architektur

Wartbarkeit

Inhalt

Gemeinschaft

Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Plan a Complex Change

Structure exploration, planning, implementation, and verification before editing several related files.

Standardize Team Instructions

Create a concise CLAUDE.md that records project-specific commands, architecture, testing rules, and repository conventions.

Scale Repetitive Analysis

Choose subagents, non-interactive commands, or parallel worktrees while preserving focused review and verification.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Improve a Task Prompt

Rewrite my request with explicit scope, relevant files, constraints, expected behavior, and one runnable verification step.

Prepare an Implementation Plan

Explore the affected code without editing. Then produce a sequenced plan with dependencies, risks, files, and verification commands.

Recover From Repeated Errors

Identify missing context behind repeated failures. Draft a fresh prompt that states the constraint, example, scope, and acceptance test.

Design a Parallel Workflow

Design separate writer and reviewer sessions using worktrees. Define ownership, allowed tools, handoff evidence, and final integration checks.

Bewährte Praktiken

Provide a runnable check and request evidence from its output.
Separate exploration, planning, implementation, and independent review for complex work.
Keep persistent instructions short, project-specific, and necessary.

Vermeiden

Do not combine unrelated tasks in one crowded session.
Do not continue correcting the same failure without improving the original context.
Do not grant broad automation permissions without reviewing data exposure and persistent changes.