evp-craft
Craft EVP Messaging for Your Audience Awareness Tier
Generic value propositions can miss the pain and awareness level of a specific audience. This skill drafts three concise alternatives and checks their specificity and fit.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "evp-craft" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„evp-craft“ wird verwendet. Draft a Tier 3 EVP for agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines. Outcome: 14 qualified meetings monthly. Tradeoff: hiring more sales representatives.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Outcome-led: For agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines, we deliver 14 qualified meetings monthly without hiring more sales representatives.
- Tradeoff-led: For agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines, we deliver 14 qualified meetings monthly without adding sales headcount.
- ICP-led: Agency owners with unpredictable pipelines use us for 14 qualified meetings monthly without hiring more sales representatives.
- Recommended primary: Outcome-led, because the supplied meeting target makes the result concrete.
- Proof needed: Evidence supporting the supplied monthly meeting target.
„evp-craft“ wird verwendet. Critique this EVP for agency owners at Tier 3: We help businesses grow faster with innovative solutions.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Word count: 8.
- Tier-fit: Unclear; the line does not name a solution or define the audience.
- Issues: The audience is broad, the outcome is unmeasured, and the tradeoff is missing.
- Rewrite requires: A concrete outcome, the prospect pain wording, and an avoided tradeoff.
- Next question: What measurable result can you substantiate for agency owners?
Sicherheitsaudit
SicherAll 14 static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks mark identifiers and output templates, not shell execution. The fixed relative paths reference framework documentation, not sensitive files. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration, or destructive instructions in SKILL.md.
Risikofaktoren
⚙️ Externe Befehle (12)
📁 Dateisystemzugriff (2)
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
cmj-hub. (2026). evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-evp-craft-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-evp-craft:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Develop segment-specific positioning
Compare three EVP angles for a defined customer segment and one awareness tier before selecting a primary message.
Prepare prospect conversation openers
Draft concise sales openers using prospect pain, a concrete outcome, and a specific tradeoff.
Review page messaging
Critique an existing headline or tagline for word count, audience fit, and specificity, then rewrite it in the same voice.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Help me choose a Schwartz awareness tier for [audience]. They describe their problem as [pain] and currently know [solutions or products]. Ask for missing details.
Draft three EVP variants for tier [1-5]. ICP: [segment]. Pain: [prospect wording]. Outcome: [specific result]. Tradeoff: [avoided cost]. Proof: [optional evidence]. Keep each within 22 words.
Critique this EVP: [text]. Intended audience: [segment]. Intended tier: [1-5]. Report word count, actual tier fit, and specific issues. Rewrite it in the same voice.
For tier [1-5], generate three variants using [ICP], [pain], [outcome], [tradeoff], and [proof]. Check every criterion, recommend a primary, and explain suitable placements. Identify unsupported claims without inventing evidence.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Use prospect language for pain and name a customer segment that excludes poor-fit audiences.
- Provide a concrete outcome and supporting evidence before selecting copy for publication.
- Review every variant against the 22-word limit, specific tradeoffs, and the selected awareness tier.
Vermeiden
- Drafting an EVP without a clear prospect pain statement.
- Replacing concrete outcomes with vague claims such as improve or grow.
- Using product-aware messaging for an audience that only recognizes its problem.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
What does this skill produce?
What information should I provide?
Must each variant contain exactly 22 words?
Can it improve an existing EVP?
Can I invoke evp-craft directly?
Does it verify outcomes or proof?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
cmj-hubLizenz
MIT
Skillstore-Revision
r1
Versionshinweis
Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.
Repository
https://github.com/cmj-hub/claude-evp/tree/dd75ba1353e0b76684398435f403006b06a9ef13/skills/evp-craftRef.
ff55fd87d71bb4d107911515793162918d5c6520
Aktualität der Wartung
3.10.2026
Nutzung
0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe
Dateistruktur
📄 SKILL.md