📦

w-retro

Name: w-retro
Author: blockmatic

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher

Review Completed Work and Improve Next Time

Teams often finish tasks without recording what changed, what evidence was missing, or what should improve. This skill produces a concise, task-specific retrospective with up to three practical next steps.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage

Review the Skillstore skill "w-retro" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/lockfile

Testen

„w-retro“ wird verwendet. We needed to add export filtering. The filter shipped and unit tests passed, but no browser test was run.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Requested versus shipped: Export filtering was added and unit-tested. Evidence gap: Browser behavior was not checked. Next change: Add one browser test for filter selection and downloaded results.

„w-retro“ wird verwendet. The task was to update the onboarding guide. The guide changed, but the examples were not checked against the current interface.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Requested versus shipped: The onboarding guide was updated, but example accuracy was not verified.
Process gap: The task lacked a user-interface consistency check.
Next changes: Review examples against the current interface and add a lightweight documentation checklist.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher

v1 • 20.9.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

The scanned skill is a 12-line, chat-only retrospective checklist with no executable code or detected security patterns. No prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, or business-logic abuse evidence was found in SKILL.md.

Gescannte Dateien

Analysierte Zeilen

Prüfelemente

Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.

Geprüft von: codex

Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

blockmatic. (2026). w-retro security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-retro-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-retro:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel

Architektur

Wartbarkeit

Inhalt

Gemeinschaft

Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Close a development task

Review the request, shipped changes, checks, and documentation before closing a coding task.

Improve team delivery

Capture specific process gaps after a sprint item, project milestone, or cross-functional deliverable.

Evaluate an AI-assisted workflow

Compare the requested work with the AI-produced result and record better checks for the next session.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Basic task retrospective

Review the completed task in this conversation. State what was requested, what shipped, and one improvement for next time.

Check process gaps

Run a retrospective on this completed task. Identify skipped checks, unclear requirements, extra scope, and missing documentation. Suggest no more than three specific changes.

Compare plan and outcome

Compare the original request, plan, implementation, and validation evidence. Explain the most important differences and recommend up to three changes for the next similar task.

Audit an AI-assisted delivery

Perform a task-specific retrospective of this AI-assisted delivery. Separate outcome gaps from process gaps, cite the available evidence, and prioritize three changes that would improve the next session.

Bewährte Praktiken

Run the skill after checks are complete and the delivered result is known.
Provide the original request, completed work, validation evidence, and relevant constraints.
Prefer specific recommendations tied to this task over broad process advice.

Vermeiden

Do not use the retrospective as a substitute for implementing a required fix.
Do not request generic lessons without sharing task-specific evidence.
Do not turn a short retrospective into an unfocused list of every possible improvement.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

When should I use this skill?

Use it after completing a task and recording the checks or evidence that support the result.

What does the skill review?

It compares the request with the shipped result and checks for process or evidence gaps.

How many improvements does it suggest?

It suggests at most three concrete changes for the next similar task.

Can it change files or create commits?

No. It responds in chat and does not implement changes, commit files, or open pull requests.

What context produces the best result?

Include the request, plan, completed work, validation checks, constraints, and known uncertainties.

Does it replace a formal incident review?

No. It supports routine task learning and does not replace incident, compliance, or security review processes.

Entwicklerdetails

Autor

blockmatic

Lizenz

MIT

Skillstore-Revision

Versionshinweis

Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.

Repository

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-retro

Ref.

7cd60e5c44d39477abb7a2c00ae0de2cf2a01392

Aktualität der Wartung

20.9.2026

Nutzung

0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📄 SKILL.md