Fähigkeiten deep-research-framework
📦

deep-research-framework

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher ⚙️ Externe Befehle

Build Research Reports with Traceable Evidence

Research reports can hide weak sources, stale facts, and unsupported conclusions. This framework guides clear questions, independent verification, and conclusion-first writing with explicit uncertainty.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage
Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research-framework" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/lockfile

Testen

„deep-research-framework“ wird verwendet. Outline research on whether our team should adopt a new documentation platform.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Main question: Does the platform meet our documentation requirements?
  • Sub-questions: What features are documented? What migration work is required? What costs are supported by current evidence?
  • Primary sources: Official documentation, pricing pages, and measured trial results.
  • Uncertainty: Actual migration effort and independent corroboration remain unresolved.

„deep-research-framework“ wird verwendet. Assess a vendor availability claim supported by one undated brochure.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Conclusion: The vendor availability claim remains a single-source claim.
  • Evidence: Only one undated vendor brochure was supplied.
  • Verification gap: No independent measurements or dated supporting documents were provided.
  • Reassessment condition: Dated operational evidence and independent corroboration could change this conclusion.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher
v1 • 6.10.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

The static command-execution finding is a false positive: SKILL.md lines 34-51 contain a fenced Markdown report outline. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration intent, or prompt injection in the reviewed skill.

1
Gescannte Dateien
60
Analysierte Zeilen
0
Prüfelemente
0
Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

⚙️ Externe Befehle (1)
SKILL.md:34-51
Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.
Geprüft von: codex
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen
Sicherheitsbewertung

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

alapha888. (2026). deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-deep-research-framework-2026, author = {alapha888}, title = {deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "alapha888" date-released: "2026-10-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:alapha888-deep-research-framework:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel
55
Architektur
85
Wartbarkeit
87
Inhalt
65
Gemeinschaft
91
Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Compare Competitors

Structure a competitor comparison around dated product evidence, independent corroboration, and gaps in available information.

Investigate a Technical Topic

Prioritize original papers and official documentation, then distinguish supported conclusions from speculation.

Prepare an Evidence-Based Brief

Organize a policy question into focused sections with traceable sources and explicit uncertainty.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Start a Research Outline 
Create a research outline for [topic]. Define one main question, up to three sub-questions, source tiers, and an uncertainty section.
Review Source Quality 
Assess these sources for [question]: [sources]. Classify their tiers, check independence, flag undated facts, and identify claims that need corroboration.
Write a Comparative Report 
Compare [option A] and [option B] using [provided evidence]. Lead with conclusions, cite numerical claims, date facts, and mark single-source claims.
Audit Conclusions and Uncertainty 
Audit this report: [report and sources]. Check source independence, unsupported numbers, speculation, and stale facts. Revise conclusions and state what would invalidate them.

Bewährte Praktiken

  • Set the main question and source tiers before gathering information.
  • Check that corroborating sources do not repeat the same original source.
  • Date key facts and state missing evidence, speculation, and reassessment conditions.

Vermeiden

  • Treating social posts or forum discussions as evidence for core conclusions.
  • Presenting single-source claims, speculation, or undated facts as established current knowledge.
  • Listing sources without clear conclusions or hiding unresolved questions.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Does this skill search the web automatically?
It defines a research workflow but includes no search implementation. Browsing depends on the host assistant and available tools.
Which sources should support conclusions?
Use primary sources and reputable secondary sources. Treat social posts, forums, and aggregators as leads rather than evidence.
How many sources does a key conclusion need?
Use at least two independent sources. Multiple sources repeating one origin do not count as independent corroboration.
What happens when only one source exists?
Label the conclusion as a single-source claim and note that independent verification is missing.
How should outdated information be handled?
Date every key fact. Treat undated information as possibly stale and explain how newer evidence could change the conclusion.
What should the final report contain?
Include core conclusions, sections ordered by conclusion, evidence, and sources, plus an uncertainty statement covering missing evidence and reassessment conditions.

Entwicklerdetails

Autor

alapha888

Lizenz

MIT

Skillstore-Revision

r1

Versionshinweis

Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.

Repository

https://github.com/alapha888/agent-skills-en/tree/f248342d20ae1e47ecfb146ea112a3e76234ff27/skills/deep-research-framework

Ref.

9bbb9af75d2f5ea5acb8fac5aec75713670a067f

Aktualität der Wartung

6.10.2026

Nutzung

0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📄 SKILL.md

Mehr von alapha888

Alle anzeigen

Ähnliche Skills

Alle anzeigen