un-editorial-check
Review Copy Against UN Editorial Rules
Editorial inconsistencies and sensitive wording are difficult to track across documents and websites. This skill checks extracted English copy and separates rule violations from human review.
Vor der Installation anhalten und eine Bestätigung anfordern.
Prüfen Sie den Plan und holen Sie vor Änderungen an Dateien die ausdrückliche Zustimmung des Benutzers ein.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "un-editorial-check" from https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„un-editorial-check“ wird verwendet. Draft text: The color of the cover was noted.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Deterministic spelling finding: color.
- Suggested wording: colour.
- The checker reports the matching rule and source. The draft remains unchanged until an approved fix is applied.
„un-editorial-check“ wird verwendet. An image-only PDF with no recoverable text.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Extraction refused: the document appears to contain scanned images without extractable text.
- The run returns exit code 2. The document is not reported as checked or clean.
„un-editorial-check“ wird verwendet. A claim-register entry contains a source but no reference date.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Human review required: record the reference date for the registered claim.
- Register completeness does not establish that the claim is true.
Sicherheitsaudit
Hohes RisikoOf 400 supplied findings, 394 are false positives; six confirm unsafe baseline creation or blocking special-file reads, with additional PDF denial-of-service risk. No evidence found of prompt injection or intentional data exfiltration in reviewed context. Review was capped at 400 of 5,037 matches; the remaining 4,637 require manual review before automatic publication. Static review was capped at 400/5037 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
Bestätigte Sicherheitsbedenken (1)
Elemente der Fähigkeitsprüfung (6)
Dies sind echte lokale Fähigkeiten, die für diese Fähigkeit erwartet werden können; daher müssen sie überprüft werden, werden jedoch nicht als bestätigtes bösartiges Verhalten gezählt.
Risikofaktoren
⚙️ Externe Befehle (50)
📁 Dateisystemzugriff (50)
🔑 Umgebungsvariablen (12)
🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (50)
⚡ Enthält Skripte (50)
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
ahaomar. (2026). un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.7.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{ahaomar-ahaomar-un-editorial-check-2026,
author = {ahaomar},
title = {un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.7.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.7.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "ahaomar"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:ahaomar-un-editorial-check:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Review Institutional Publications
Check briefing papers for spelling, dates, terminology, and sensitive wording while preserving source references for editorial decisions.
Check Product Interface Copy
Review visible HTML and supported JavaScript copy before release, with optional publishing or accessibility findings reported separately.
Track Evidence Review
Create a claim register for detected figures and comparisons, then check source and reference-date completeness after human review.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Review [draft.md] with un-editorial-check. Report deterministic violations separately from findings requiring human review. Do not modify the file.
Check [document.pdf] and write an HTML review report to [report.html]. Preserve rule sources and PDF page references. State extraction refusals clearly.
Show the target files in [content-directory]. Preview deterministic fixes for eligible prose files. Request approval before applying changes, then review the resulting diff.
Check [content-directory] using [organization-profile.json] and [claims.json]. Compare [baseline.json] and export SARIF. Keep optional audit findings separate from editorial failures.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Keep rule sources, confidence labels, and human-review recommendations attached to each finding.
- Show target files and preview corrections before approving writes; review every resulting diff.
- Use isolated, resource-limited processing for untrusted documents and review every extraction refusal.
Vermeiden
- Treating a clean run as factual verification, legal clearance, or United Nations approval.
- Automatically rewriting sensitive terminology, claims, or diplomatic language from heuristic findings.
- Using watch mode in CI or relying on optional audit findings to determine the process exit code.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Which assistants can use this skill?
Does it verify facts or provide United Nations approval?
Which files can it review?
Will it rewrite my documents automatically?
Does it retrieve pages or upload my documents?
What do exit codes mean?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
ahaomarLizenz
MIT
Autorenversion
v1.7.0
Skillstore-Revision
r1
Repository
https://github.com/ahaomar/un-editorial-check/tree/376d68d3408673fe1f4a30bb53d82f4eba36cc64/Ref.
03d5e23fbf7bb87a093ed68c17ce9b3dd9b9934b
Aktualität der Wartung
2.10.2026
Nutzung
0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe
Dateistruktur
📁 .github/
📄 ci.yml
📁 action/
📄 main.mjs
📁 agents/
📁 bin/
📁 config/
📄 generic-british-english.json
📁 docs/
📁 assets/
📄 un-editorial-check-banner.jpeg
📁 demo/
📁 fonts/
📁 lib/
📄 cli.mjs
📄 fix.mjs
📄 html.mjs
📄 init.mjs
📄 pdf.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 LICENSE
📁 rules/
📁 scripts/
📄 SKILL.md
📄 codex.md
📁 social/
📁 tests/
📁 audits/
📁 demo/
📁 fix/
📁 lanes/
📄 web-p0-incoherent-insertion.html
📄 mixed.js
📄 re002.js
📁 lib/
📄 run.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 VERSION