📦

webask-benchmark

Name: webask-benchmark
Author: webaskio

مراجعة المحتوى r1 آمن 📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية

Compare WebAsk Survey Results

Survey scores can mislead when questionnaire changes, sample sizes, and seasonal differences are ignored. This skill guides WebAsk comparisons using version history, response distributions, and shared survey metrics.

يدعم: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 برونزي

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 برونزي

التثبيت باستخدام Agent لدي

انسخ هذا الطلب إلى Agent لديك. يتضمن صفحة Skill المعتمدة وملف manifest.

طلب الوكيل

Review the Skillstore skill "webask-benchmark" from https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

يجب أن يواصل Agent عرض خطته وطلب أي تأكيد تفرضه سياسة الأمان.

موارد مهيّأة لـ Agents

استخدم هذه الروابط عندما يحتاج AI Agent أو crawler أو script إلى سياق نظيف بدلًا من قراءة الصفحة كاملة.

تفاصيل Markdown GET /skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark.md manifest موقَّع GET /api/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/manifest lockfile موقَّع GET /api/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/lockfile

اختبرها

جارٍ استخدام "webask-benchmark". Illustrative comparison: spring averaged 4.0 from 286 responses; autumn averaged 4.3 from 318 responses. The questionnaire was unchanged.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

The average increased by 0.3 points, from 4.0 to 4.3.
Spring had 286 responses; autumn had 318.
No questionnaire changes were reported, but seasonal and audience differences still need consideration.
These averages and counts alone do not establish statistical significance or explain the cause.

جارٍ استخدام "webask-benchmark". Illustrative comparison: two periods use different wording and response options for the satisfaction question.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

The satisfaction answers are not directly comparable because the question and response options changed.
Do not present the score difference as a satisfaction trend.
Review shared operational metrics separately, with clear comparability caveats.

التدقيق الأمني

آمن

v1 • ٢٩‏/٩‏/٢٠٢٦ فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

All four static findings are false positives: documentation navigation links and Markdown formatting around MCP tool names. No evidence found of prompt injection, unauthorized data transfer, or executable shell commands in the reviewed files. The skill describes survey analysis through external MCP tools; their implementations were not included in this review.

الملفات التي تم فحصها

136

الأسطر التي تم تحليلها

عناصر المراجعة

تم تجاهل الإيجابيات الكاذبة

عوامل الخطر

📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات (1)

README.md:1

⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية (3)

SKILL.md:23 SKILL.md:25 SKILL.md:27

لم يكتشف أحدث تدقيق ثابت ودلالي مكتمل أي نتائج أمنية مؤكدة. ولا يثبت ذلك أن المهارة خالية من الآثار الجانبية.

دقّقه: codex

شارك واستشهد بهذا التقرير

شارك تقرير التقييم المرتبط بالإصدار والشارة المحايدة وبطاقة التضمين والاستشهادات. تعرض Skillstore الأدلة من دون أن تقرر ما إذا كانت هذه المهارة آمنة.

فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

نسخ رابط التقرير

https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

شارة Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

شارة HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

بطاقة قابلة للتضمين

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

الاستشهادات الأكاديمية (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

اقتباس APA

webaskio. (2026). webask-benchmark security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/audits/1

اقتباس BibTeX

@techreport{webaskio-webaskio-webask-benchmark-2026,
  author = {webaskio},
  title = {webask-benchmark security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "webask-benchmark security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "webaskio"
date-released: "2026-09-29"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-benchmark/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:webaskio-webask-benchmark:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

تقييم Skillstore

سبب هذا التقييم موثوقية الأدلة: متوسط

الهندسة المعمارية

قابلية الصيانة

المحتوى

المجتمع

الامتثال للمواصفات

ما الذي يمكنك بناؤه

Review Customer Satisfaction Changes

Compare repeated survey periods to identify rating and distribution changes while checking questionnaire consistency.

Compare Survey Completion

Compare completion rates and completion times across account surveys without treating answers to different questions as equivalent.

Assess Feedback After a Release

Compare feedback before and after a release while distinguishing observed changes from unproven explanations.

جرّب هذه الموجّهات

Compare Two Survey Periods

Compare [survey] during [period A] and [period B]. Check questionnaire versions and report average ratings, changes, and response counts.

Compare Completion Across Surveys

Compare completion rates and completion times for [survey A] and [survey B]. Use only shared metrics and explain any comparability limits.

Investigate Distribution Changes

Compare [survey] across [period A] and [period B]. Check version history, then examine answer distributions, average scores, and sample sizes. Label hypotheses clearly.

Evaluate Comparison Reliability

Evaluate whether [survey] results from [period A] and [period B] support a reliable comparison. Check questionnaire changes, period lengths, seasonality, and sample sizes. Separate observed differences from unsupported significance or causal claims.

أفضل الممارسات

Check questionnaire version history before interpreting changes between survey periods.
Use comparable period lengths and consider seasonal or audience differences.
Report distributions and sample sizes alongside averages, and label explanations that remain hypotheses.

تجنب

Treating answers to different questions as directly comparable.
Presenting small score differences as reliable improvement without sufficient evidence.
Interpreting higher response volume as proof of better product quality.

الأسئلة المتكررة

What does this skill compare?

It compares one WebAsk survey across periods or shared operational metrics across different surveys in an account.

Which tools are required?

It depends on get_quiz_list, get_quiz_report, get_quiz_summary, and get_quiz_versions through MCP.

Can it compare surveys with different questions?

It can compare shared metrics such as completion rates and completion times. Answers to different questions are not directly comparable.

Does it provide a formal statistical significance test?

No statistical test is implemented or specified. The instructions call for sample-size caution and an assessment of whether differences are meaningful.

Does it modify surveys or recommend paid upgrades?

The documented workflow uses retrieval tools. It instructs the assistant to report account limits and stop without recommending payment or plan changes.

Which language does it use for responses?

The source instructions are in Russian, but they direct the assistant to respond in the language used by the requester.