📦

stow

Name: stow
Author: theislampill

v0.4.2 مراجعة المحتوى r1 آمن ⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية🔑 متغيرات البيئة🌐 الوصول إلى الشبكة📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات

Standardize Technical Writing with STOW

Technical documents often lose precision when prose, commands, paths, and structured data are edited inconsistently. STOW applies output contracts and focused prose review while preserving protected literals.

يدعم: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 برونزي

التثبيت باستخدام Agent لدي

انسخ هذا الطلب إلى Agent لديك. يتضمن صفحة Skill المعتمدة وملف manifest.

طلب الوكيل

Review the Skillstore skill "stow" from https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/theislampill-stow/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

يجب أن يواصل Agent عرض خطته وطلب أي تأكيد تفرضه سياسة الأمان.

موارد مهيّأة لـ Agents

استخدم هذه الروابط عندما يحتاج AI Agent أو crawler أو script إلى سياق نظيف بدلًا من قراءة الصفحة كاملة.

تفاصيل Markdown GET /skills/theislampill-stow.md manifest موقَّع GET /api/skills/theislampill-stow/manifest lockfile موقَّع GET /api/skills/theislampill-stow/lockfile

اختبرها

جارٍ استخدام "stow". Rewrite a deployment README while preserving its commands and configuration names.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

A concise README with the installation path first, direct headings, consistent terminology, and unchanged commands and configuration names.

جارٍ استخدام "stow". Review a migration runbook for operational completeness.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

Add a precondition stating the required backup and access checks.
Add a verification result and rollback action to the migration step.
Keep the existing service name, command text, and evidence references unchanged.

جارٍ استخدام "stow". Check a handoff artifact against its schema and report the result.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

The report separates parse failures, schema violations, unresolved references, and advisory prose concerns so the owner can correct the artifact.

التدقيق الأمني

آمن

v1 • ٦‏/٩‏/٢٠٢٦ فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

All 254 static matches are false positives in their reviewed context. They are documentation literals, schema identifiers, parser patterns, or local validation references; no command execution, network request, secret access, destructive file operation, or encoded payload was evidenced. No prompt-injection or data-exfiltration intent was found.

الملفات التي تم فحصها

13,928

الأسطر التي تم تحليلها

عناصر المراجعة

تم تجاهل الإيجابيات الكاذبة

عوامل الخطر

⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية (50)

🔑 متغيرات البيئة (2)

rules/conflicts.yaml:191 rules/conflicts.yaml:193

🌐 الوصول إلى الشبكة (21)

📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات (6)

rules/registry.yaml:2405 runtime/lint_prose.py:107 runtime/query_rules.py:199 runtime/query_rules.py:27 runtime/validate.py:541 runtime/validate.py:328

لم يكتشف أحدث تدقيق ثابت ودلالي مكتمل أي نتائج أمنية مؤكدة. ولا يثبت ذلك أن المهارة خالية من الآثار الجانبية.

دقّقه: claude

شارك واستشهد بهذا التقرير

شارك تقرير التقييم المرتبط بالإصدار والشارة المحايدة وبطاقة التضمين والاستشهادات. تعرض Skillstore الأدلة من دون أن تقرر ما إذا كانت هذه المهارة آمنة.

فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

نسخ رابط التقرير

https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

شارة Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/theislampill-stow/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

شارة HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/theislampill-stow/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

بطاقة قابلة للتضمين

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/theislampill-stow.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

الاستشهادات الأكاديمية (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

اقتباس APA

theislampill. (2026). stow security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 0.4.2]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow/audits/1

اقتباس BibTeX

@techreport{theislampill-theislampill-stow-2026,
  author = {theislampill},
  title = {stow security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow/audits/1},
  note = {Author version 0.4.2}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "stow security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "0.4.2"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "theislampill"
date-released: "2026-09-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/theislampill-stow/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:theislampill-stow:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

تقييم Skillstore

سبب هذا التقييم موثوقية الأدلة: متوسط

الهندسة المعمارية

قابلية الصيانة

المحتوى

المجتمع

100

الامتثال للمواصفات

ما الذي يمكنك بناؤه

Polish technical documentation

Rewrite a README or public technical document for direct structure, precise claims, consistent terminology, and preserved command examples.

Prepare operational procedures

Shape runbooks, plans, audits, and handoffs into bounded steps with visible evidence, limitations, verification, and rollback details.

Validate structured deliverables

Check JSON, JSONL, YAML, or Markdown artifacts against their contracts while retaining literal values and reporting structural defects.

جرّب هذه الموجّهات

Clean up a README

Rewrite this README for direct technical clarity. Preserve every command, path, identifier, quotation, and data value. Return only the revised README.

Review a runbook

Review this runbook for missing preconditions, unclear actions, unsupported claims, and absent verification or rollback details. List concrete corrections and preserve all commands exactly.

Check a structured artifact

Validate this JSON, JSONL, YAML, or Markdown artifact against the stated contract. Report parse and structural issues, distinguish warnings from failures, and do not rewrite protected values.

Audit rule applicability

Apply STOW to this technical document. Classify each region, identify the active profile and relevant rule conflicts, preserve protected literals, and return the smallest complete set of corrections with evidence.

أفضل الممارسات

State the output contract and protected literals before requesting a rewrite.
Provide authoritative sources for claims, numbers, terminology, and required formats.
Use the named validator on the actual final artifact when the format has a supported schema.

تجنب

Do not ask STOW to invent commands, evidence, versions, citations, or current system state.
Do not treat advisory prose findings as proof of a security, correctness, or authorship defect.
Do not label editable text as protected when the requested change requires literal editing.