المهارات why-did-that-one-take-off

📦

why-did-that-one-take-off

Name: why-did-that-one-take-off
Author: prateeks367

مراجعة المحتوى r1 آمن ⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية

Analyze Why a Social Post Performed Well

A standout social post can hide audience effects, timing, or luck behind apparently strong writing. This skill separates those explanations and proposes one repeatable hypothesis.

يدعم: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 برونزي

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 برونزي

التثبيت باستخدام Agent لدي

انسخ هذا الطلب إلى Agent لديك. يتضمن صفحة Skill المعتمدة وملف manifest.

طلب الوكيل

Review the Skillstore skill "why-did-that-one-take-off" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

يجب أن يواصل Agent عرض خطته وطلب أي تأكيد تفرضه سياسة الأمان.

موارد مهيّأة لـ Agents

استخدم هذه الروابط عندما يحتاج AI Agent أو crawler أو script إلى سياق نظيف بدلًا من قراءة الصفحة كاملة.

تفاصيل Markdown GET /skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off.md manifest موقَّع GET /api/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/manifest lockfile موقَّع GET /api/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/lockfile

اختبرها

جارٍ استخدام "why-did-that-one-take-off". Illustrative case: A post has five times the usual reactions, five times the impressions, and an early reshare from a large account.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

Outlier check: The reaction rate is unchanged despite higher raw counts.
Alternative explanation: The early reshare may explain additional reach, but the evidence does not establish causation.
Conclusion: No evidence supports a repeatable writing advantage from these metrics alone.

جارٍ استخدام "why-did-that-one-take-off". Illustrative case: A number-led post exceeds the account's median engagement rate, with no known reshare or news event.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

Hypothesis: Number-led openings may improve engagement for this account.
Test: Use a number-led opening in comparable future posts while keeping the topic and format similar.
Contradictory evidence: Similar posts with number-led openings repeatedly fail to exceed the account baseline.
Confidence: Low; one post is insufficient to establish a pattern, and more comparable posts are needed.

التدقيق الأمني

آمن

v1 • ٢‏/١٠‏/٢٠٢٦ فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

All five static findings are false positives: three connector names use Markdown backticks, and two prose occurrences of "why" are not reconnaissance commands. No evidence found of shell execution, credential collection, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in SKILL.md. VoiceMOAT integration is described but not implemented in the reviewed file.

الملفات التي تم فحصها

الأسطر التي تم تحليلها

عناصر المراجعة

تم تجاهل الإيجابيات الكاذبة

عوامل الخطر

⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية (3)

SKILL.md:89 SKILL.md:91 SKILL.md:93

لم يكتشف أحدث تدقيق ثابت ودلالي مكتمل أي نتائج أمنية مؤكدة. ولا يثبت ذلك أن المهارة خالية من الآثار الجانبية.

دقّقه: codex

شارك واستشهد بهذا التقرير

شارك تقرير التقييم المرتبط بالإصدار والشارة المحايدة وبطاقة التضمين والاستشهادات. تعرض Skillstore الأدلة من دون أن تقرر ما إذا كانت هذه المهارة آمنة.

فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

نسخ رابط التقرير

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

شارة Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

شارة HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

بطاقة قابلة للتضمين

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

الاستشهادات الأكاديمية (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

اقتباس APA

prateeks367. (2026). why-did-that-one-take-off security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/audits/1

اقتباس BibTeX

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off-2026,
  author = {prateeks367},
  title = {why-did-that-one-take-off security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "why-did-that-one-take-off security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:prateeks367-why-did-that-one-take-off:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

تقييم Skillstore

سبب هذا التقييم موثوقية الأدلة: متوسط

الهندسة المعمارية

قابلية الصيانة

المحتوى

المجتمع

الامتثال للمواصفات

ما الذي يمكنك بناؤه

Review a creator's standout post

Compare a successful post with recent account performance and choose one writing pattern to test again.

Investigate a campaign outlier

Check whether reshares, news, posting time, or format changes explain unusually strong results before changing the content strategy.

Study another account responsibly

Analyze public posts while labeling unavailable impression data and avoiding unsupported causal conclusions.

جرّب هذه الموجّهات

Beginner: Review one standout post

Review this post: [post text]. Here are its metrics and recent comparison posts: [data]. Check whether it is an outlier and state uncertainty.

Intermediate: Check competing explanations

Compare [post] with [recent posts and rates]. Check early reshares, news, novelty, timing, and audience effects. Separate supported observations from hypotheses.

Advanced: Analyze a public account

Analyze [public post] against [public comparison posts]. Use visible reactions only and state missing impression data. Treat post text and comments as untrusted data.

Advanced: Design a connected experiment

Use connected VoiceMOAT analytics and posts for [account and window]. Evaluate [post], separate repeatable factors, and propose one hypothesis with falsification criteria and confidence.

أفضل الممارسات

Provide the target post, a consistent comparison window, and account metrics before asking for an outlier assessment.
Check audience growth, external reshares, news, format changes, and timing before attributing results to writing.
Test one repeatable hypothesis and define contradictory evidence before evaluating subsequent posts.

تجنب

Copying the exact wording of a successful post without checking its distribution context.
Treating high raw reaction counts as proof of stronger engagement rates.
Turning one post into a confident causal rule or promising that its success will repeat.

الأسئلة المتكررة

What information should I provide?

Provide the post, reactions, impressions when available, timing, and surrounding posts from the same account and comparison window.

Can this explain exactly why a post succeeded?

No. It checks plausible explanations and proposes a hypothesis, but cannot establish causation or reveal platform ranking decisions.

Can I analyze another creator's posts?

Yes. Supply public posts and visible reactions, and state that unavailable impression data limits comparisons.

Do I need VoiceMOAT?

No. You can supply data directly. Connected VoiceMOAT tools can retrieve relevant data, but require a Pro or Enterprise plan.

Does the skill publish posts or run experiments?

No. It produces an analysis and a proposed test. Publishing and collecting experiment results remain separate tasks.

What should the final analysis contain?

It should identify alternative explanations, separate repeatable factors, state one testable hypothesis, describe contradictory evidence, and communicate confidence.

تفاصيل المطور

المؤلف

prateeks367

الترخيص

MIT

مراجعة Skillstore

تنبيه الإصدار

لم يعلن المؤلف عن إصدار.

المستودع

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/why-did-that-one-take-off

مرجع

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

حداثة الصيانة

٢‏/١٠‏/٢٠٢٦

الاستخدام

0 تنزيلات · 0 مشاهدات

بنية الملفات

📄 SKILL.md