المهارات who-am-i-writing-for
📦

who-am-i-writing-for

مراجعة المحتوى r1 آمن ⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية

Identify Your Readers from Real Responses

Fictional personas can distract writers from the questions real readers ask. This skill uses engagement, reader responses, and posts to identify audience questions and vocabulary.

يدعم: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 برونزي

التثبيت باستخدام Agent لدي

انسخ هذا الطلب إلى Agent لديك. يتضمن صفحة Skill المعتمدة وملف manifest.

طلب الوكيل
Review the Skillstore skill "who-am-i-writing-for" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

يجب أن يواصل Agent عرض خطته وطلب أي تأكيد تفرضه سياسة الأمان.

موارد مهيّأة لـ Agents

استخدم هذه الروابط عندما يحتاج AI Agent أو crawler أو script إلى سياق نظيف بدلًا من قراءة الصفحة كاملة.

تفاصيل Markdown GET /skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.md manifest موقَّع GET /api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/manifest lockfile موقَّع GET /api/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/lockfile

اختبرها

جارٍ استخدام "who-am-i-writing-for". Two readers ask, 'Does this work with no budget?' and 'What if we have no designer?' Our post describes 'resource-efficient creative operations.'

النتيجة المتوقعة:

  • Reader questions: Does this work with no budget? What if we have no designer?
  • Vocabulary comparison: readers say 'no budget' and 'no designer'; the post says 'resource-efficient creative operations.'
  • Evidence strength: provisional, based on two responses. Collect more comments and compare responses across subjects before expanding the question list.

جارٍ استخدام "who-am-i-writing-for". Connected analytics show tutorial posts received 100 reactions across 2,000 impressions. Opinion posts received 150 reactions across 10,000 impressions.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

  • Tutorial posts: 5% reactions relative to impressions. Opinion posts: 1.5%.
  • Tutorials have the higher reaction rate despite fewer total reactions.
  • Reader questions and vocabulary remain unknown without responses. These figures do not establish reader demographics.

التدقيق الأمني

آمن
v1 • ٢‏/١٠‏/٢٠٢٦ فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

All three static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks format connector tool names, not executable shell expressions. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential extraction, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT connection describes analytics access without instructions to execute commands or transmit secrets.

1
الملفات التي تم فحصها
90
الأسطر التي تم تحليلها
0
عناصر المراجعة
0
تم تجاهل الإيجابيات الكاذبة

عوامل الخطر

⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية (3)
SKILL.md:81 SKILL.md:84 SKILL.md:86
لم يكتشف أحدث تدقيق ثابت ودلالي مكتمل أي نتائج أمنية مؤكدة. ولا يثبت ذلك أن المهارة خالية من الآثار الجانبية.
دقّقه: codex
شارك واستشهد بهذا التقرير

شارك تقرير التقييم المرتبط بالإصدار والشارة المحايدة وبطاقة التضمين والاستشهادات. تعرض Skillstore الأدلة من دون أن تقرر ما إذا كانت هذه المهارة آمنة.

فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار
تقييم الأمان

نسخ رابط التقرير

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

شارة Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

شارة HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

بطاقة قابلة للتضمين

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
الاستشهادات الأكاديمية (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

اقتباس APA

prateeks367. (2026). who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1

اقتباس BibTeX

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for-2026, author = {prateeks367}, title = {who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "who-am-i-writing-for security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "prateeks367" date-released: "2026-10-02" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:prateeks367-who-am-i-writing-for:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

تقييم Skillstore

سبب هذا التقييم موثوقية الأدلة: متوسط
55
الهندسة المعمارية
85
قابلية الصيانة
87
المحتوى
65
المجتمع
83
الامتثال للمواصفات

ما الذي يمكنك بناؤه

Plan Posts Around Reader Questions

Turn real comments and replies into recurring questions and compare audience vocabulary with the language used in published posts.

Investigate Audience Mismatch

Review who engages and which subjects receive responses to distinguish the observed audience from the audience a business hoped to reach.

Review Topic Performance

Use connected VoiceMOAT posts and analytics to group subjects and compare reactions relative to impressions rather than raw counts.

جرّب هذه الموجّهات

Identify Initial Reader Questions 
Here are my posts and reader comments: [evidence]. What questions are readers asking? Use their wording and state where evidence is missing.
Compare Reader and Writer Vocabulary 
Compare these posts [posts] with these responses [responses]. List reader terms beside my terms and explain mismatches without inventing audience traits.
Assess an Audience Mismatch 
I intend to reach [audience]. Review [posts, responses, and engagement evidence]. Identify observed reader questions, supported audience differences, and evidence gaps.
Build a Connected Evidence Review 
Use my authorized VoiceMOAT connection to review posts, analytics, and voice insights. Combine these with [reader responses]. Group subjects and compare reactions relative to impressions. Produce six to ten evidence-based questions, vocabulary comparisons, and provisional conclusions. Identify existing reader conversations only when supported.

أفضل الممارسات

  • Provide representative posts and actual responses, with sensitive personal details removed.
  • Keep reader wording intact and separate directly observed facts from unsupported audience assumptions.
  • Group posts by subject and report sample size, missing evidence, and provisional conclusions.

تجنب

  • Inventing demographics, lifestyles, or named characters to make audience research appear complete.
  • Treating follower counts or raw reaction totals as proof of reader needs.
  • Presenting a few comments as a complete audience picture without stating uncertainty.

الأسئلة المتكررة

What evidence should I provide?
Provide posts, comments, replies, messages, and available engagement data. Focus on people who engage rather than only on followers.
Can this skill create a traditional persona?
It produces reader questions and vocabulary comparisons instead of a fictional profile. It does not invent demographics or named characters.
What happens when I have no reader responses?
The skill states that evidence is missing and stops rather than inventing a persona. Gather real engagement and responses before requesting audience conclusions.
Do I need VoiceMOAT?
No. You can supply evidence directly. Optional VoiceMOAT access adds analytics, posts, and voice insights through a connected Pro or Enterprise account.
Which AI tools are supported?
The skill supports Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Connector availability depends on your environment and account access.
How reliable are conclusions from a small sample?
Conclusions remain provisional when evidence is limited. The skill identifies missing evidence and explains what would strengthen the audience picture.

تفاصيل المطور

المؤلف

prateeks367

الترخيص

MIT

مراجعة Skillstore

r1

تنبيه الإصدار

لم يعلن المؤلف عن إصدار.

المستودع

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/who-am-i-writing-for

مرجع

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

حداثة الصيانة

٢‏/١٠‏/٢٠٢٦

الاستخدام

0 تنزيلات · 0 مشاهدات

بنية الملفات

📄 SKILL.md