📦

interface-review

Name: interface-review
Author: jakubkrehel

مراجعة المحتوى r1 آمن ⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات

Review Interface Changes with Clear Evidence

Interface changes can introduce visual, accessibility, and content regressions across connected surfaces. This skill resolves the change scope and produces evidence-based findings with clear status labels.

يدعم: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 برونزي

التثبيت باستخدام Agent لدي

انسخ هذا الطلب إلى Agent لديك. يتضمن صفحة Skill المعتمدة وملف manifest.

طلب الوكيل

Review the Skillstore skill "interface-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

يجب أن يواصل Agent عرض خطته وطلب أي تأكيد تفرضه سياسة الأمان.

موارد مهيّأة لـ Agents

استخدم هذه الروابط عندما يحتاج AI Agent أو crawler أو script إلى سياق نظيف بدلًا من قراءة الصفحة كاملة.

تفاصيل Markdown GET /skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md manifest موقَّع GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest lockfile موقَّع GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/lockfile

اختبرها

جارٍ استخدام "interface-review". Review the current branch and include uncommitted interface changes.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

Scope: seven commits and two uncommitted files against the default branch.
Coverage: twelve files after exclusions, with two affected surfaces reviewed.
Finding: a dialog lost its accessible name in this change. Status: Regression. Severity: High.
Verdict: Block until the accessible name is restored.

جارٍ استخدام "interface-review". Review pull request 482 for interface issues.

النتيجة المتوقعة:

Scope: the fetched pull request head compared with its merge base.
Coverage: no interface evidence was found in excluded generated files.
No actionable interface findings were introduced or regressed.
Verdict: Approve.

التدقيق الأمني

آمن

v1 • ٤‏/٩‏/٢٠٢٦ فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

All 44 static findings are false positives. The external-command alerts mistake Markdown formatting and examples for Ruby execution; the other alerts describe bounded review scope or isolated worktree use. No evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration intent, destructive behavior, or other semantic security issues was found.

الملفات التي تم فحصها

289

الأسطر التي تم تحليلها

عناصر المراجعة

تم تجاهل الإيجابيات الكاذبة

عوامل الخطر

⚙️ الأوامر الخارجية (40)

📁 الوصول إلى نظام الملفات (1)

SKILL.md:104

لم يكتشف أحدث تدقيق ثابت ودلالي مكتمل أي نتائج أمنية مؤكدة. ولا يثبت ذلك أن المهارة خالية من الآثار الجانبية.

دقّقه: codex

شارك واستشهد بهذا التقرير

شارك تقرير التقييم المرتبط بالإصدار والشارة المحايدة وبطاقة التضمين والاستشهادات. تعرض Skillstore الأدلة من دون أن تقرر ما إذا كانت هذه المهارة آمنة.

فتح التقرير المرتبط بالإصدار

نسخ رابط التقرير

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

شارة Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

شارة HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

بطاقة قابلة للتضمين

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

الاستشهادات الأكاديمية (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

اقتباس APA

jakubkrehel. (2026). interface-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1

اقتباس BibTeX

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-interface-review-2026,
  author = {jakubkrehel},
  title = {interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-interface-review:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

تقييم Skillstore

سبب هذا التقييم موثوقية الأدلة: متوسط

الهندسة المعمارية

قابلية الصيانة

المحتوى

المجتمع

الامتثال للمواصفات

ما الذي يمكنك بناؤه

Review a feature branch

Check interface changes across the branch and local edits before opening a pull request.

Assess a pull request

Resolve the pull request ref, inspect affected surfaces, and identify interface regressions.

Verify accessibility changes

Inspect removed semantics, focus behavior, labels, and motion preferences within the selected change.

جرّب هذه الموجّهات

Review my current changes

Review the current interface changes. Resolve the default scope and report only introduced or regressed interface issues.

Review a pull request

Review pull request 482 for interface regressions. Include the resolved scope, affected surfaces, exclusions, coverage, and status for each finding.

Review an explicit range

Review release..feature as written. Check removed lines, expand affected consumers, and separate introduced, regressed, and pre-existing findings.

Audit a shared design token change

Review this design token change across two consumer hops. Prioritize rendered entry points, explain coverage limits, and verify each claimed regression against the base.

أفضل الممارسات

Name the target explicitly when you need a pull request, ref, branch, or range reviewed.
Provide the change intent so missing states and incomplete behavior can be evaluated.
Request rendered verification when findings depend on runtime behavior or visual output.

تجنب

Do not use this skill as a whole-repository audit without routing directly to better-interface.
Do not treat pre-existing issues as failures caused by the current change.
Do not assume runtime or visual behavior was verified when the report marks it unverified.